Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical trials integrity: a CRO perspective.

J E Beach1

  • 1Council on Data Protection, Quintiles Transnational Corp., 4709 Creekstone Drive, Suite 200, Durham, NC 27703, USA.

Accountability in Research
|December 17, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

No "killer tomatoes": easing federal regulation of genetically engineered plants.

Food and drug law journal·2002
Same author

The new RAC: restructuring of the National Institutes of Health recombinant DNA Advisory Committee.

Food and drug law journal·2002
Same author

Black box warnings in prescription drug labeling: results of a survey of 206 drugs.

Food and drug law journal·1999
Same author

The prescription drug marketing act: a solution in search of a problem?

Food and drug law journal·1996
Same author

Spontaneous neoplasia in the ferret (Mustela putorius furo).

Journal of comparative pathology·1993
Same author

Rapid release of multiple hormones from rat pituitaries perifused with recombinant interleukin-1.

Life sciences·1989
Same journal

Correction.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Development, validity, and reliability of the pre-attendance conference evaluator (PACE) tool for identifying predatory conferences.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Managing manuscripts with potential dual-use research of concern: A thematic analysis of life science journal policies.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Researching retraction: Do we need more rules or more honesty?

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Accountability in evidence syntheses: On the need for rigorous peer review and reporting guidelines.

Accountability in research·2026
Same journal

Shared responsibility to address questionable research practices? - A study of perceived efficacy of organizational research integrity policies.

Accountability in research·2026
See all related articles

Contract Research Organizations (CROs) have evolved from specialized service providers to full-service partners in clinical trials. CROs now manage significant regulatory and ethical responsibilities, requiring strict vigilance to ensure data integrity and subject protection.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research
  • Pharmaceutical Industry
  • Regulatory Affairs

Background:

  • Contract Research Organizations (CROs) initially offered specialized services for clinical trials.
  • The industry has seen a shift towards full-service CROs managing comprehensive trial aspects.
  • This evolution has led to CROs assuming greater regulatory and ethical responsibilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the evolving role and responsibilities of CROs in clinical trials.
  • To highlight the increasing regulatory and ethical oversight placed upon CROs.
  • To emphasize the critical need for CRO vigilance in maintaining trial integrity.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the historical development and service expansion of CROs.
  • Analysis of the regulatory landscape and ethical considerations impacting CRO operations.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchLegal ApproachNational Bioethics Advisory CommissionOffice for Human Research Protection

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of industry standards and auditing practices for CROs.

    • Main Results:

    • CROs have transitioned to full-service providers, encompassing site selection, patient recruitment, safety monitoring, data management, and biostatistics.
    • CROs are now subject to extensive regulation, including federal, state, and international guidelines, and must adhere to their own operating procedures.
    • Industry judgment of CROs is based on service scope, quality, adherence to protocols, regulatory compliance, timelines, professional relationships, and data validity.

    Conclusions:

    • CROs play a pivotal role in modern clinical trials, managing substantial regulatory and ethical risks.
    • The comprehensive nature of CRO services necessitates strict vigilance across all trial stages.
    • Ensuring adherence to laws, regulations, and industry standards is paramount for protecting human subjects and maintaining data integrity.