Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Human vs machine: evaluation of fluorescence micrographs.

Tim W Nattkemper1, Thorsten Twellmann, Helge Ritter

  • 1Neuroinformatics Group, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, P O Box 100131, D-33501, Bielefeld, Germany. tnattkemper@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de

Computers in Biology and Medicine
|December 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Out of sight, but not out of mind: Key issues regarding seafloor macrolitter monitoring.

Marine pollution bulletin·2025
Same author

Scaling down annotation needs: The capacity of self-supervised learning on diatom classification.

iScience·2025
Same author

Comparative analysis of motor skill acquisition in a novel bimanual task: the role of mental representation and sensorimotor feedback.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2024
Same author

Exploring motor skill acquisition in bimanual coordination: insights from navigating a novel maze task.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Face Generation and Editing With StyleGAN: A Survey.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2024
Same author

A data science approach for multi-sensor marine observatory data monitoring cold water corals (Paragorgia arborea) in two campaigns.

PloS one·2023
Same journal

ECG arrhythmia classification via wavelet-driven feature extraction and swarm-optimised gradient boosting.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Electro-osmotic metachronal cilia transport of viscoelastic blood infused with penta-hybrid nanoparticles in an oviduct: Analytical and neural network modeling.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

sEEGnal: an automated EEG preprocessing pipeline evaluated against expert-driven preprocessing.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Integrating experimental biology, computational methods, and artificial Intelligence in anticancer drug discovery: Bridging the translational Gap" [Comput. Biol. Med. 213 (2026) 111832].

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Organ dose optimization for a point-of-care forearm X-ray photon-counting CT.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Physics-guided transformation of breathomic feature spaces into disease-specific representations for respiratory disease classification.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
See all related articles

Neural network algorithms match medium-skilled experts in analyzing lymphocyte fluorescence microscopy images. While experts outperform algorithms in noisy images, the neural networks offer significantly faster cell detection for high-throughput screening.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical imaging
  • Computational pathology
  • Immunohistochemistry

Background:

  • High-throughput screening of molecular phenotypes requires advanced imaging techniques.
  • Analyzing lymphocyte invasion in human tissues is crucial for understanding disease.
  • Accurate and automated evaluation of fluorescence microscopy images is essential for research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop methods for measuring the accuracy of fluorescence micrograph interpretation.
  • To compare the performance of human experts and neural network algorithms in image analysis.
  • To evaluate the efficiency of automated cell detection systems.

Main Methods:

  • Multi-parameter fluorescence microscopy was used to image lymphocytes in human tissue.
  • Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to assess interpretation accuracy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance comparison between human experts (varying skill levels) and neural network algorithms.

    • Main Results:

    • Neural network algorithms achieved accuracy comparable to medium-skilled human experts on good quality images.
    • Human experts demonstrated superior accuracy over algorithms when analyzing images with increased noise.
    • Neural network-based cell detection was substantially faster than manual interpretation by human experts.

    Conclusions:

    • Automated analysis using neural networks shows promise for high-throughput screening of lymphocyte phenotypes.
    • Algorithm performance is sensitive to image quality, with human expertise remaining valuable for challenging datasets.
    • Neural networks offer a significant speed advantage in cell detection, facilitating faster research workflows.