Short peptide receptor mimics for atherosclerosis risk assessment of LDL

Short peptides sequences were selected that showed binding selectivity towards healthy or oxidised (unhealthy) low density lipoprotein (LDL), respectively. These were investigated for application in atherosclerosis risk monitoring. Comparison was also made with the LDL receptor ligand repeat peptide (LR5). The peptides were immobilised on a gold surface plasmon resonance surface and LDL binding detected as a shift in the resonance. 3.7x10(7) (+/-5.6x10(6)) LDL/mm(2)/microg/ml solution LDL were bound on GlySerAspGlu-OH and 6.8x10(7) (+/-9.2x10(6)) LDL/mm(2)/microg/ml on GlyCystineSerAspGlu, compared with approximately 10(8) LDL/mm(2)/microg/ml on LR5. In this first group, binding of LDL decreased with oxidation level and a good correlation was found between LDL binding and residual amino groups on the apoprotein of the LDL following oxidation, or the change in relative electrophoretic mobility (REM) of LDL. The decrease in binding was 1.1x10(7) LDL particles/mm(2) per% oxidation for GlySerAspGlu-OH, 1.8x10(7) LDL particles/mm(2) per% oxidation for GlyCystineSerAspGlu and 2.4x10(7) LDL particles/mm(2) per% oxidation for LR5. A second group of three peptides were also selected showing increased binding with LDL oxidation: GlyCystineCysCys (1.5x10(7) LDL/mm(2) per microg/ml), GlyLysLysCys-SH (10(7) LDL/mm(2) per microg/ml) and GlyLysLys-OH (5.6x10(7) LDL/mm(2) per microg/ml). The latter gave a linear increase in LDL binding with oxidation level (1.2x10(7) LDL particles/mm(2) per% oxidation). LDL concentration is around 2-3 mg/ml in plasma compared with the low detection levels with this method (1-10 microg/ml), allowing a strategy to be developed requiring the minimum sample volume and diluting with physiological buffer prior to assay. By using a comparative reading between LDL adsorption on surfaces from the first and second group of peptides (e.g. GlyCystineSerAspGlu and GlyLysLys-OH, respectively), LDL oxidation could be determined without knowledge of LDL concentration. Higher binding was seen on GlyCystineSerAspGlu than GlyLysLys-OH below 30% LDL oxidation, whereas above 30% oxidation the binding on the latter surface was greater. Simple correlation of this form could provide good tests for atherosclerosis risk.