Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2026

A Novel Rescue Technique for Difficult Intubation and Difficult Ventilation
Published on: January 17, 2011
[The utility of the interrupter technique in pediatric asthma]
Akiko Iimura1, Shigemi Yoshihara, Osamu Arisaka
1Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Japan. sunflower@ppp.bekkoame.ne.jp
Insights
Interrupter respiratory resistance (Rint) offers a new way to measure airway resistance in children. This study found Rint more effective than PEF tests for assessing treatment response in mild pediatric asthma attacks.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Respiratory Physiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
Context:
- Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease in children.
- Accurate assessment of airway resistance is crucial for effective asthma management.
- Existing lung function tests like Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) may have limitations in evaluating mild exacerbations.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the utility of Interrupter respiratory resistance (Rint) as a lung function test in pediatric patients with asthma.
- To compare the effectiveness of Rint with PEF in assessing therapeutic responses to bronchodilators in children with mild to moderate asthma attacks.
Summary:
- The study compared Rint and PEF measurements in 37 asthmatic children and 9 healthy controls.
- Neither Rint nor PEF changed after saline inhalation in asthmatic patients.
- Both Rint and PEF improved significantly after beta(2) stimulant inhalation in the asthma group, with Rint showing greater utility.
Impact:
- Interrupter respiratory resistance (Rint) may be a more sensitive and useful tool than PEF for evaluating bronchodilator response in pediatric asthma.
- These findings support the use of Rint as a valuable respiratory function test for children with asthma.
- Improved diagnostic tools can lead to more timely and effective asthma treatment in pediatric populations.
Abstract:
Interrupter respiratory resistance (Rint) is a new lung function test for measuring airway resistance. We investigated the utility of the Rint lung function test in pediatric patients with asthma. Thirty seven asthmatic patients with mild or moderate asthma attack (asthma group) and 9 healthy children (control group) were enrolled in the study, and the utility of the Ring test was compared with that of the PEF lung function test. Rint and PEF were measured after the inhalation of saline or beta(2) stimulant, and the values for the asthma and control groups were compared. The rint and PEF values did not change after the inhalation of saline, but both values improved after the inhalation of beta(2) stimulant in the asthma group. In the control group, the PEF and Rint values measured after saline or beta(2) stimulant were not significantly different. Rint measurements may be more useful than PEF tests for evaluating therapeutic responses to mild asthma attacks in children. These findings suggest that Rint is a useful respiratory function test for evaluating children with asthma.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Used in Lower Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Bronchodilators, the first step of respiration enhancement, come in various forms, each with its own mechanism...
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Asthma-I: Introduction
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Inhaled Medications
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

