Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of quality improvement programmes.

J Øvretveit1, D Gustafson

  • 1Nordic School of Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Sweden. jovret@aol.com

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|December 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knowledge about infections is associated with antibiotic use: cross-sectional evidence from the health survey Northern Ireland.

BMC public health·2021
Same author

Kidney tubule health scores and their associations with incident CKD in women living with HIV.

HIV medicine·2021
Same author

Measuring implementation: development of the implementation process assessment tool (IPAT).

BMC health services research·2019
Same author

Genetic basis for variation in plasma IL-18 levels in persons with chronic hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus-1 infections.

Genes and immunity·2017
Same author

Cholesterol in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease in a birth cohort over 14 years.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2013
Same author

Endometrial tissue and blood plasma concentration of ceftiofur and metabolites following intramuscular administration of ceftiofur crystalline free acid to mares.

Equine veterinary journal·2013
Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
See all related articles

Many countries implement quality improvement programs, but evidence of their effectiveness is limited. Research is needed to guide the planning and implementation of these complex health system interventions for better quality of care.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Growing concerns about healthcare quality have led to widespread national and hospital-level quality improvement programs.
  • These initiatives include strategies, accreditation, assessment, and review processes, with significant resource allocation.
  • However, robust evidence on their effectiveness and optimal implementation conditions is scarce.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the lack of research on the effectiveness of large-scale quality improvement programs in healthcare.
  • To explore the methodological challenges in evaluating these complex interventions.
  • To provide guidance on available methods for evaluating such programs and inform future research.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of methodological challenges in evaluating complex, long-term social interventions within dynamic health systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification and description of available research methods suitable for program evaluation.
  • Presentation of examples and guidance for conducting future research in this area.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant methodological challenges exist in measuring outcomes and attributing causality for quality improvement initiatives.
    • Despite challenges, research methods are available to evaluate these programs effectively.
    • Future research can provide evidence-based guidance for decision-makers.

    Conclusions:

    • There is a critical need for rigorous evaluation research on healthcare quality improvement programs.
    • Available methods can overcome methodological hurdles to assess program effectiveness.
    • Such research is vital for enhancing program impact and advancing the science of quality improvement.