Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Advancing vascular access. Improve safety through heightened device performance.

Kelli Rosenthal1

  • 1ResourceNurse.com, Oceanside, NY, USA.

Nursing Management
|December 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeting "never events".

Nursing management·2009
Same author

What you need to know about ports.

Nursing·2008
Same author

Bridging the I.V. access gap with midline catheters.

Nursing·2008
Same author

Reducing the risks of infiltration and extravasation.

Nursing·2007
Same author

Are you up-to-date with the infusion nursing standards?

Nursing·2007
Same author

Avoiding common perils of drug administration.

Nursing·2007

Federal law requires safety intravenous (I.V.) equipment in U.S. healthcare. Manufacturers now provide diverse safety devices to minimize I.V. site complications and enhance patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Device Technology
  • Patient Safety
  • Healthcare Regulation

Background:

  • Federal legislation mandates the use of safety intravenous (I.V.) equipment across U.S. healthcare facilities.
  • The mandate aims to reduce needlestick injuries and other site-related incidents.
  • Healthcare providers face increasing requirements for safer medical devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of federal mandates on the development and availability of safety I.V. equipment.
  • To review the range of safety I.V. devices introduced by manufacturers.
  • To assess the effectiveness of these devices in reducing I.V. site incidents.

Main Methods:

  • Review of federal regulations concerning medical device safety.
  • Survey of I.V. device manufacturers regarding product lines.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of product literature and reported incident rates (where available).

    • Main Results:

    • A significant increase in the variety of safety I.V. devices has been observed.
    • Products target various aspects of I.V. therapy, including insertion, use, and disposal.
    • Manufacturers are actively innovating to meet regulatory demands and market needs.

    Conclusions:

    • The federal mandate has successfully spurred innovation in safety I.V. equipment.
    • Enhanced availability of safety devices supports the reduction of healthcare-associated incidents.
    • Continued monitoring and adoption of safety I.V. technology are crucial for patient and provider well-being.