Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiobjective optimization of combinatorial libraries.

D K Agrafiotis1

  • 13-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 665 Stockton Drive, Suite 104, Exton, Pennsylvania 19341, USA. dimitris.agrafiotis@3dp.com

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
|December 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiobjective optimization of combinatorial libraries.

Molecular diversity·2003
Same author

Variable selection for QSAR by artificial ant colony systems.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2002
Same author

Combinatorial networks.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2001
Same author

Design and prioritization of plates for high-throughput screening.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2001
Same author

A constant time algorithm for estimating the diversity of large chemical libraries.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2001
Same author

Introduction and foreward to the special issue on combinatorial library design.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2001
Same journal

Repurposing bleomycin against Acinetobacter baumannii HisG: computational, biophysical, and antibacterial evidence.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Topological data analysis for antibody-drug conjugate payload discovery: a computational framework for mechanistic classification and target validation.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Commentary on the fundamentals and development of artificial intelligence models in the life sciences and best research practices.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

RANQSAR: a standalone open-source application for reproducible machine learning-based QSAR analysis.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Integrating evolutionary and compositional features with ML and DL for robust and interpretable druggable protein prediction.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

QUAD: a composite risk framework integrating uncertainty, applicability domain, and model disagreement for reliable QSAR predictions.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
See all related articles

Designing optimal chemical libraries requires balancing multiple objectives. This study introduces multiobjective optimization algorithms using simulated annealing or evolutionary approaches for robust subset selection in combinatorial chemistry.

Area of Science:

  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • Combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening have transformed experimental design.
  • Designing ideal chemical libraries is complex, involving diverse criteria and often conflicting objectives.
  • A single metric rarely defines the quality of a library design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a class of algorithms for subset selection based on multiobjective optimization principles.
  • To develop a method for simultaneously optimizing multiple, potentially conflicting, design criteria for chemical libraries.
  • To provide a robust and extensible framework for designing high-quality chemical libraries.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing an objective function that incorporates all desired selection criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing simulated annealing or evolutionary algorithms to identify optimal or near-optimal compound subsets.
  • Accommodating diverse criteria such as diversity, similarity to known actives, predicted activity (QSAR), selectivity, property distributions, and reagent cost.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method enables the simultaneous optimization of multiple design objectives.
    • The approach is robust, convergent, and extensible, offering user control over objective weighting.
    • Compounds can be selected from multiple libraries in full- or sparse-array formats.

    Conclusions:

    • Multiobjective optimization provides a powerful framework for designing complex chemical libraries.
    • The presented algorithms offer a systematic and efficient approach to chemical library design.
    • This method enhances the ability to create libraries tailored to specific drug discovery needs.