[Determination of indicators for non-compliance with guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis]

We conducted a prospective study to identify predictors of inappropriateness of surgical prophylaxis. A total of 72 surgeon-anaesthesist pairs participated in data collection. We assessed practices by addressing 5 questions: did the surgical procedure justify the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis, and was it provided? Was the correct agent used? Was the timing of prophylaxis optimal? Was the duration of prophylaxis correct? Was the dose correct? We reviewed 687 procedures, 513 (74.7%) of which were included in the analysis. The proportion of these procedures with totally compliant prescriptions was 41.7%. Of the 156 patients who received an inappropriate drug, 133 (85.3%) received a drug with a broader spectrum than that recommended. Prophylaxis lasted too long in 81 (89.0%) of the 91 patients who received prophylaxis of incorrect duration. Multivariate analysis revealed a clear association between non-compliant prophylaxis and two operation-specific factors: prosthesis implantation (with a relative risk of 2.52) and clean-contaminated operations (with a relative risk of 4.19). More than 50% of patients received inappropriate surgical prophylaxis. Non-observance of guidelines was related to factors that did not influence the infectious potential of the flora.