Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sexual disabilities are not singularities.

K Fugl-Meyer1, A R Fugl-Meyer

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

International Journal of Impotence Research
|December 21, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Symptoms of sexual dysfunction among men from infertile couples: prevalence and association with testosterone deficiency.

Andrology·2019
Same author

The effect of tadalafil on psychosocial outcomes in Swedish men with erectile distress: a multicentre, non-randomised, open-label clinical study.

International journal of clinical practice·2006
Same author

Use of healthcare a long time after severe burn injury; relation to perceived health and personality characteristics.

Disability and rehabilitation·2005
Same author

Early conceptual and linguistic development of a patient and partner treatment satisfaction scale (TSS) for erectile dysfunction.

European urology·2004
Same author

On categorization and quantification of women's sexual dysfunctions: an epidemiological approach.

International journal of impotence research·2004
Same author

Definitions of women's sexual dysfunction reconsidered: advocating expansion and revision.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2004
Same journal

Attachment orientation and sexual excitation and inhibition independently predict sexual desire and sexual arousal, but their interaction does not.

International journal of impotence research·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Application of gelatin sponge (Gelfoam®) as a hemostatic agent in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

International journal of impotence research·2026
Same journal

It Comes at Night: A Nocturnal Emissions Historical Review.

International journal of impotence research·2026
Same journal

Challenging the paradigm: what is vasculogenic erectile dysfunction?

International journal of impotence research·2026
Same journal

Comment on: GLP-1 receptor agonists and male sexual health: translating cardiometabolic benefits into erectile outcomes.

International journal of impotence research·2026
Same journal

Erectile and ejaculatory outcomes after penile fracture repair: a comparative analysis of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures.

International journal of impotence research·2026
See all related articles

Sexual disabilities frequently occur together within and across genders, impacting sexual well-being. Addressing these issues from a partner relationship perspective is crucial for effective clinical practice.

Area of Science:

  • Sexuality and Relationships
  • Public Health
  • Clinical Psychology

Background:

  • Previous research reported on the prevalence of sexual disabilities and associated problems.
  • This study investigates the concurrence of sexual disabilities and their impact on sexual well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the intra- and inter-gender concurrence of sexual disabilities and problems.
  • To assess the relative risk of low sexual well-being predicted by sexual disabilities and distress.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of a nationally representative sample of Swedish women (n=1335) and men (n=1475) aged 18-74 years.
  • Combined structured interviews with questionnaires/checklists.
  • Analysis of sexual disabilities, problems, and sexual well-being.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Significant concurrence of sexual disabilities within and across genders was observed.
  • 48% of women and 26% of men reported at least one own sexual disability.
  • Low sexual interest and orgasmic difficulties were key predictors of low sexual well-being for both genders.

Conclusions:

  • Sexual disabilities and related distress should be viewed from a partner relationship perspective in clinical practice.
  • Interventions should consider the relational dynamics of sexual health.
  • Understanding concurrence is vital for comprehensive sexual health assessment.