Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Two tests of the stuck-in-time hypothesis
William A Roberts1, Shelley Roberts
1Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. roberts@uwo.ca
Rats cannot learn to remember when events occurred or anticipate future events, supporting the stuck-in-time hypothesis. Experiments show rats did not alter behavior to gain rewards based on timing or anticipation.
Area of Science:
- Animal Cognition
- Behavioral Neuroscience
- Memory Research
Background:
- The stuck-in-time hypothesis posits that animals lack the ability to temporal-discriminate events.
- This implies a deficit in remembering event timing and anticipating future occurrences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally test the stuck-in-time hypothesis in rodent models.
- To investigate whether rats can learn to associate specific temporal elements with reward.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Rats were trained on a radial maze, incentivized to re-enter the first-visited arm for a larger reward.
- Experiment 2: Rats were trained to delay entry into a distinctive arm for a larger reward.
- Control groups in both experiments did not receive timing-based reward contingencies.
Main Results:
- In Experiment 1, rats did not preferentially re-enter the first arm early, performing similarly to controls.
- In Experiment 2, rats failed to learn to delay entry into the distinctive arm, showing no advantage over controls.
- Neither experiment demonstrated that rats could learn to time-date events or anticipate future rewards.
Conclusions:
- The findings provide further empirical support for the stuck-in-time hypothesis.
- Rodents may not possess the cognitive mechanisms to remember when events occurred.
- The results suggest limitations in animal temporal cognition and future anticipation.
Related Concept Videos
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

