Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two tests of the stuck-in-time hypothesis.

William A Roberts1, Shelley Roberts

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. roberts@uwo.ca

The Journal of General Psychology
|December 24, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of a group pain education and exercise program for people with persistent low back pain that includes expert patient peers as mentors. A qualitative analysis of patient experiences with the UPLIFT program.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2025
Same author

Clinical Dietitians' Perspectives on Nutrition Care Discharge Practices for Older Adults With Malnutrition: Insights From a Qualitative Exploratory Study.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2025
Same author

'Making the System Work': A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Dietitians' Use of iEMR to Support Nutrition Care Transitions for Older Adults with Malnutrition.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Energy accuracy of nutritional fluids provided in hospital: comparing nutrition label values against direct bomb calorimetry.

The British journal of nutrition·2025
Same author

Patient expectations and understanding of hospital food service provision when declaring a food allergy.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2024
Same author

Lost in Transition: Insights from a Retrospective Chart Audit on Nutrition Care Practices for Older Australians with Malnutrition Transitioning from Hospital to Home.

Nutrients·2024
Same journal

Cognitive and emotional benefits of piano training: effects on working memory and psychological well-being.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

The efficacy of mindfulness based interventions in mitigating stress and fostering enhanced mindfulness among higher education students.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Age and gender differences in the factor structure of cognitive monitoring.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

How social context modulates the roles of fairness, reciprocity, and empathy on advantageous inequity aversion.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Predicting a few or many friends in schoolchildren: a machine learning approach.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Can Psychological Capital Enhance Innovation? A three-wave intervention and the role of consideration of future consequences.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
See all related articles

Rats cannot learn to remember when events occurred or anticipate future events, supporting the stuck-in-time hypothesis. Experiments show rats did not alter behavior to gain rewards based on timing or anticipation.

Area of Science:

  • Animal Cognition
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • The stuck-in-time hypothesis posits that animals lack the ability to temporal-discriminate events.
  • This implies a deficit in remembering event timing and anticipating future occurrences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally test the stuck-in-time hypothesis in rodent models.
  • To investigate whether rats can learn to associate specific temporal elements with reward.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Rats were trained on a radial maze, incentivized to re-enter the first-visited arm for a larger reward.
  • Experiment 2: Rats were trained to delay entry into a distinctive arm for a larger reward.
  • Control groups in both experiments did not receive timing-based reward contingencies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • In Experiment 1, rats did not preferentially re-enter the first arm early, performing similarly to controls.
  • In Experiment 2, rats failed to learn to delay entry into the distinctive arm, showing no advantage over controls.
  • Neither experiment demonstrated that rats could learn to time-date events or anticipate future rewards.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide further empirical support for the stuck-in-time hypothesis.
  • Rodents may not possess the cognitive mechanisms to remember when events occurred.
  • The results suggest limitations in animal temporal cognition and future anticipation.