Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combining health plan performance indicators into simpler composite measures.

Alan M Zaslavsky, James A Shaul, Lawrence B Zaborski

    Health Care Financing Review
    |December 26, 2002
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Supplemental Items Reduce HCAHPS Response Rates, but Response Rates Do Not Affect HCAHPS Scores: A Randomized Experiment.

    Medical care·2025
    Same author

    Hospital Patient Experience Worsened With the COVID-19 Pandemic, Especially for Older Adults, and Remains Worse than Before.

    Medical care research and review : MCRR·2025
    Same author

    A New CAHPS Measure of Patient Experiences With Mental Health and Substance Use Care.

    Health services research·2025
    Same author

    Coding intensity variation in Medicare Advantage.

    Health affairs scholar·2025
    Same author

    Measuring Access to Mental Health Services Among Primary Care Patients.

    Medical care·2024
    Same author

    Primary Care Physicians In Medicare Advantage Were Less Costly, Provided Similar Quality Versus Regional Average.

    Health affairs (Project Hope)·2024
    Same journal

    Health Care Indicators.

    Health care financing review·2014
    Same journal

    Achieving cost control in the hospital outpatient department.

    Health care financing review·2014
    Same journal

    Age Estimates in the National Health Accounts.

    Health care financing review·2014
    Same journal

    Managed care: Practice, pitfalls, and potential.

    Health care financing review·2014
    Same journal

    Overview.

    Health care financing review·2014
    Same journal

    Research Issues: Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries, Challenges and Opportunities.

    Health care financing review·2014
    See all related articles

    Researchers developed four summary scores combining Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Study (CAHPS) and Health Plan Employer Data Information System (HEDIS) measures for Medicare managed care (MMC) plans. These scores simplify performance evaluation, covering care, access, vaccinations, and clinical quality.

    Area of Science:

    • Health Services Research
    • Quality Improvement
    • Healthcare Performance Measurement

    Background:

    • Medicare managed care (MMC) plans utilize multiple performance measures, including the Consumer Assessment of Health Plan Study (CAHPS) survey and Health Plan Employer Data Information System (HEDIS).
    • Existing measures can be numerous, potentially complicating comprehensive performance assessment and comparison.
    • There is a need to streamline performance reporting for better interpretability and actionable insights.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the combination of CAHPS and HEDIS measures into a reduced set of summary performance scores for MMC plans.
    • To identify a parsimonious set of scores that capture the majority of performance variability.

    Main Methods:

    • Factor analysis or similar statistical techniques were likely employed to identify underlying dimensions within the CAHPS and HEDIS datasets.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The analysis focused on measures relevant to Medicare managed care plans.
  • The study aimed to create summary scores that are substantively interpretable and internally consistent.
  • Main Results:

    • Four summary performance scores were identified that effectively capture most of the variability in the original CAHPS and HEDIS measures.
    • These four scores represent key domains: care at the doctor's office, customer service and access, vaccinations, and clinical quality measures.
    • The derived summary scores demonstrated substantive interpretability and internal consistency.

    Conclusions:

    • A simplified framework of four summary scores can adequately represent the performance of Medicare managed care plans based on CAHPS and HEDIS data.
    • These summary scores offer a more manageable and interpretable way to assess and compare plan performance.
    • The findings support the use of these composite scores for quality improvement initiatives and reporting.