Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Producing useful research about quality improvement.

John Øvretveit1

  • 1Nordic School of Public Health, Norway.

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance Incorporating Leadership in Health Services
|December 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving complex systems with improve-mentation: challenges and solutions.

Frontiers in health services·2026
Same author

Applying implementation science to infectious disease emergency preparedness and response.

Frontiers in public health·2025
Same author

SIREN 2025 National Research Meeting: Advancing the Science of Social Care.

Health services research·2025
Same author

Managers' Experience of the Response of the Health System to the Covid-19 Pandemic for Inpatient Geriatric Care: Lessons About Organisation and Resilience.

The International journal of health planning and management·2024
Same author

Rapid response systems, antibiotic stewardship and medication reconciliation: a scoping review on implementation factors, activities and outcomes.

BMJ quality & safety·2024
Same author

Modelling a System to Help Improve It Comment on "Insights Gained From a Re-analysis of Five Improvement Cases in Healthcare Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research".

International journal of health policy and management·2023

Many healthcare quality improvement interventions lack evaluation. This paper suggests research designs and methods, including theory-building and user-focused approaches, to better assess these processes and inform implementation decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Numerous quality improvement interventions (e.g., educational programs, hospital strategies) remain unevaluated.
  • A gap exists in understanding the effectiveness and implementation of quality improvement processes in healthcare settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for increased research into quality improvement processes.
  • To propose suitable research designs and methods, including less common healthcare approaches.
  • To guide the selection of appropriate research designs based on intervention complexity.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of research designs tailored to intervention levels and complexity.
  • Emphasis on theory-building approaches for complex interventions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Introduction of collaborative action evaluation and user-focused research methodologies.

    • Main Results:

    • Research design choice should align with intervention complexity.
    • Theory-building approaches are recommended for higher-level, complex interventions.
    • Collaborative and user-focused research offer valuable insights for decision-making and process development.

    Conclusions:

    • Further research is needed to evaluate quality improvement processes effectively.
    • Adopting diverse research methodologies can enhance understanding and implementation of quality initiatives.
    • User-focused and collaborative evaluations are crucial for developing and refining quality improvement interventions.