Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Constraints have different concurrent effects and aftereffects on variability.

Patricia D Stokes1, Helen M Harrison

  • 1Department of Psychology, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, New York 10027, USA. pstokes@barnard.columbia.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|December 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unexpected downshifts in reward magnitude induce variation in human behavior.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Effects of practice on variability, effects of variability on transfer.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2008
See all related articles

Early learning constraints impact response variability differently during and after their removal. Less restrictive constraints increase variability during, while more restrictive ones boost it post-constraint, influencing acquired learning strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Learning
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Understanding how learning constraints affect performance variability is crucial for designing effective training protocols.
  • Early research indicates that constraints can shape learning, but their specific impact on response variability over time remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the differential effects of task constraints versus variability constraints on response variability during and after their imposition.
  • To explore how the restrictiveness of constraints influences the acquisition and modification of learning strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using a computer game to examine the effects of task constraints and variability constraints.
  • Task constraints limited response options, while variability constraints mandated response novelty relative to prior actions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Constraint restrictiveness was systematically varied across experiments.

    • Main Results:

    • Less restrictive constraints led to higher response variability while they were active.
    • More restrictive constraints resulted in greater response variability after they were removed.
    • These findings suggest distinct effects based on constraint type and restrictiveness.

    Conclusions:

    • The type and restrictiveness of early learning constraints significantly modulate response variability both during and after their application.
    • Learners appear to acquire general strategies (default rules) under constraints, which are then refined with exceptions (exception rules) once constraints are relaxed.