Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Survey Safety01:28

Survey Safety

Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
Minor Losses in Pipes01:25

Minor Losses in Pipes

In pipe systems, minor losses refer to energy losses arising from components such as valves, bends, fittings, expansions, and other features that disrupt the steady flow of fluid. These disturbances cause energy dissipation through turbulence and resistance, which engineers quantify to manage system efficiency effectively.
Valves play a significant role in generating minor losses by obstructing or redirecting the fluid flow. When a valve is closed or partially closed, it restricts the flow...
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different reasons...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Beyond Awareness: Building Human Factors Capability in Healthcare Through Shared Resources.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2026
Same author

Investigation of Redundant Visual Patterns to Improve Usability of Labels.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Sex-Specific Phenotypes and Outcomes in Non-Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Interstitial Lung Disease: Results from the INSIGHTS-ILD Registry.

Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases·2026
Same author

Verbal and visual information exchange in EMS-to-ED patient handovers: An observational and attitudinal study.

International emergency nursing·2025
Same author

Context-Based Human Influence and Causal Responsibility for Assisted Decision-Making.

Human factors·2025
Same author

A Unique Simulation Methodology for Practicing Clinical Decision Making.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Why better operators receive worse warnings.

Joachim Meyer1, Yuval Bitan

  • 1Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. joachim@bgumail.bgu.ac.il

Human Factors
|December 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Human operators can unintentionally degrade the effectiveness of dynamic warning systems. As operators improve, the diagnostic value of warnings decreases, impacting system design and decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Cognitive systems engineering
  • Risk management

Background:

  • Dynamic warning systems are typically designed with fixed diagnostic values.
  • Operator responses are expected to align with these predefined values for optimal decision-making.
  • This conventional approach may be insufficient for complex systems managed by human operators.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how human operators' actions influence the predictive value of dynamic warning systems.
  • To analyze the impact of operator learning and adaptation on warning system efficacy.
  • To demonstrate the counterintuitive decrease in warning system diagnostic value with improved operator performance.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of warning system dynamics in human-controlled complex systems.

More Related Videos

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2026

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

  • Empirical study involving a process control task with binary warnings and events.
  • Experimental design to measure operator responses and system performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Operator actions can alter the frequency of events triggering warnings.
    • The predictive value of a warning system is shown to decrease as operator proficiency increases.
    • A statistically significant inverse relationship was observed between operator skill and warning system diagnostic value.

    Conclusions:

    • Standard diagnostic values for dynamic warning systems may not be appropriate for human-operated complex systems.
    • Operator-induced changes in event frequencies reduce the utility of imperfect warning systems.
    • Findings suggest a need for adaptive warning system designs that account for operator behavior and learning.