Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

Evaluating Dryocosmus Kuriphilus-induced Damage on Castanea Sativa
Published on: August 30, 2018
Jeffrey D Henderer1, Connie Liu, Muge Kesen
1William and Anna Goldberg Glaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA. henderer@willsglaucoma.org
Purpose:
To report the reliability of the glaucoma disk damage likelihood scale (DDLS) in comparison to the Armaly cup/disk ratio by determining the interobserver and intraobserver agreement for optic disk stereo photographs and the interobserver agreement for in vivo patient measurements of the optic disk.
Design:
Observational case series.
Methods:
Optic disk photographs: 48 stereo pairs of optic nerve photographs were selected from patients with a spectrum of glaucomatous visual field loss. Two masked observers graded the optic disk photographs three times according to the DDLS and Armaly cup/disk ratio. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were calculated using the test-retest method. Patient measurements: three observers performed in vivo patient measurements on 34 eyes of glaucoma clinic patients and made a single determination of the DDLS stage and Armaly cup/disk ratio, based on the indirect biomicroscopic examination. Level of interobserver agreement was tabulated.
Results:
Optic disk photographs: interobserver and intraobserver agreement for the vertical DDLS measurement was greater than for two determinations (clinical impression and measured) of the vertical Armaly cup/disk ratio (interobserver: 85% vs 68% and 74%, respectively; intraobserver grader 1: 97% vs 89% and 80%, grader 2: 99% vs 95% and 89%, respectively). In vivo patient measurements: the interobserver agreement for the DDLS and Armaly cup/disk ratio was similar (70.1% vs 67.6%, respectively).
Conclusions:
For the stereo optic disk photographs, the inter- and intra-observer agreement for the DDLS is greater than the Armaly cup/disk ratio. For the in vivo patient measurements, the level of agreement for the DDLS and the Armaly cup/disk ratio is similar.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Calculating Safe Diameter for Wind-Exposed Disc
Yield Criteria for Ductile Materials under Plane Stress
The Maximum Shearing Stress Criterion, also known as the...
Fatigue
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Design Consideration
The factor of safety is another key aspect...