Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Detection of intentional sub-optimal performance on a computerized finger-tapping task.

Barry A Tanner1, Richard L Bowles, Evan L Tanner

  • 1Life Stress Center 3S-14, Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, MI 48201, USA. btanner@dmc.org

Journal of Clinical Psychology
|January 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary

The T3 computerized finger-tapping task effectively differentiates individuals simulating optimal performance from those simulating sub-optimal performance. This study highlights the T3's utility in detecting simulated deficits in cognitive tasks.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validity of global physical and emotional SUDS.

Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback·2011
Same author

Multimodal behavioral treatment of nonrepetitive, treatment-resistant nightmares: a case report.

Perceptual and motor skills·2005
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology

Background:

  • The T3 computerized finger-tapping task is a tool used in neuropsychological assessments.
  • Distinguishing genuine cognitive impairment from malingering is crucial in clinical and forensic settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the efficacy of the T3 finger-tapping task in discriminating between simulated optimal and sub-optimal performance in undergraduates.
  • To identify specific performance metrics on the T3 task that differentiate between these two motivational states.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-four undergraduates were divided into two groups: one simulating head injury for an insurance evaluation (Group HI) and another simulating a job applicant (Group J).
  • Participants completed the T3 computerized finger-tapping task under their assigned simulation conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance data, including tapping speed, fatigue, hand performance similarity, preferred hand advantage, and variability, were analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • Group HI (simulating head injury) exhibited slower tapping speeds compared to Group J.
    • Group HI demonstrated less fatigue and less similarity between right- and left-hand performance.
    • A reduced speed advantage for the preferred hand was observed in Group HI.
    • While Group HI showed less variability for the non-preferred hand, no significant difference in preferred hand variability was found between groups.

    Conclusions:

    • The T3 computerized finger-tapping task successfully discriminates between individuals simulating optimal and sub-optimal performance on multiple measures.
    • Findings suggest the T3 task is a sensitive tool for detecting simulated cognitive deficits, particularly in contexts requiring performance validity assessment.