Bone status evaluation with calcaneal ultrasound in children with chronic rheumatic diseases. A one year followup

Fernanda Falcini1, Giuseppe Bindi, Gabriele Simonini

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Rheumatology Unit, University of Florence, Italy. falcini@unifi.it

Insights

Quantitative ultrasound effectively monitors bone health in children with chronic rheumatic diseases (CRD). Alendronate improved bone status, while steroids showed a decrease, highlighting treatment impacts on pediatric bone density.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Rheumatology
  • Bone Metabolism
  • Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging

Background:

  • Children with chronic rheumatic diseases (CRD) often experience impaired bone status.
  • Monitoring bone health is crucial for managing long-term outcomes in pediatric CRD patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess bone status in children with CRD at baseline and after one year using quantitative ultrasound.
  • To evaluate the impact of different therapeutic regimens on bone parameters.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative ultrasound (Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation - BUA) was performed on the calcaneus of 67 children (2.80-18.10 years) with CRD.
  • Patient groups included juvenile idiopathic arthritis, juvenile dermatomyositis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Bone status was analyzed in relation to medication, including NSAIDs, methotrexate, steroids, and alendronate.

Main Results:

  • Children with CRD exhibited significantly lower baseline BUA values and Z scores compared to controls.
  • Overall BUA values increased significantly after one year, but Z scores did not change.
  • Children receiving steroids showed decreased BUA and Z scores, while those on alendronate demonstrated significant increases in both BUA and Z scores.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus is a valuable tool for assessing and monitoring bone status in pediatric CRD.
  • Therapeutic interventions significantly influence bone health outcomes in children with CRD.
  • Alendronate shows promise in improving bone density, whereas steroid use may negatively impact bone status.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos