Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Considerations in breast imaging diagnosis].

Tokiko Endo1

  • 1Department of Radiology, National Nagoya Hospital.

Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. Nippon Acta Radiologica
|January 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine guidelines on non-mass abnormalities of the breast.

Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001)·2023
Same author

Validity of computed mean compressed fibroglandular tissue thickness and breast composition for stratification of masking risk in Japanese women.

Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)·2023
Same author

Polygon method: A systematic margin assessment for breast conservation.

Cancer medicine·2019
Same author

Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, "volumetric measurement", predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists.

Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)·2018
Same author

[Consideration to the Quality Assurance of Mammography].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi·2018
Same author

Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with new reconstruction and new processing for dose reduction.

Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)·2017

Interpreting mammograms, especially focal asymmetric density (FAD), requires careful analysis of density, margins, and internal structure. Understanding calcification shapes and distribution, along with architectural distortion, is crucial for accurate breast cancer diagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Mammography interpretation presents challenges, particularly in distinguishing focal asymmetric density (FAD) from mass lesions.
  • Accurate assessment of calcifications and architectural distortion is vital for differentiating benign from malignant breast conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify diagnostic criteria for challenging mammographic findings.
  • To emphasize the importance of comparative analysis and detailed feature assessment in breast imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of focal asymmetric density (FAD) considering gland volume, margins, and internal structure.
  • Detailed evaluation of calcification shape and distribution patterns.
  • Differential diagnosis of architectural distortion, considering benign and malignant etiologies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Focal asymmetric density (FAD) assessment requires comparison with equal gland volume, defined margins, and consistent internal structure.
  • Calcification shape and distribution are key indicators for intra-ductal breast cancer, though some shapes can mimic benign lesions.
  • Architectural distortion necessitates consideration of differential diagnoses including fibrosis, radial scars, and inflammatory or surgical scars.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate mammographic interpretation relies on meticulous assessment of FAD, calcifications, and architectural distortion.
  • Pathological assessment and advancements in mammographic technology are fundamental for reliable breast cancer diagnosis.
  • A thorough understanding of differential diagnoses is essential for interpreting ambiguous mammographic findings.