Construct validity of the Life Orientation Test
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Problem-Solving Before Instruction (PS-I): A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Diana Roscow Terrill1, Dara G Friedman, Louis A Gottschalk
1Counseling Center, Towson University, USA.
Abstract:
The Life Orientation Test (LOT; Scheier & Carver, 1985) is a common measure of optimism. Previous studies of the convergent and discriminant (vis-à-vis neuroticism) validity of the LOT have relied solely on questionnaires. Our Study 1 was a multitrait, multimethod investigation of the LOT incorporating Gottschalk and Gleser's (1969) method of content analysis of speech samples as a nonquestionnaire assessment method. The LOT did not correlate significantly with the Gottschalk Hope Scale (Gottschalk, 1974) derived from speech samples. Study 2 was an initial attempt to determine the nature of the differences between these alternate measures of optimism. In particular, it was hypothesized and found that the LOT was more fakable than the Hope Scale. Participants who received special instructions to "fake good" scored significantly higher on the LOT than did control participants who received no special instructions. Faking instructions did not significantly affect scores on the Hope Scale.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Rotter's Locus of Control
Individuals with an internal locus of control believe that their personal efforts and decisions directly affect their...
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Trait Theory by Gordon Allport