Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Definitions and implications of death.

Anna V Schlotzhauer1, Bryan A Liang

  • 1Health Law & Policy Institute, University of Houston Law Center, 100 Law Center, Houston, TX 77204-6060, USA.

Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America
|January 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary

The legal definition of death, currently whole-brain death, is debated. Expanding this definition could increase organ donation but raises concerns about misdiagnosis and personal beliefs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing Characteristics and Compliance of Online Delta-8 Tetrahydrocannabinol Product Sellers.

Cannabis and cannabinoid research·2023
Same author

Liability Before Diagnosis: Failure to Admit in a Stroke Case.

Stroke·2023
Same author

Understanding Medical Malpractice Lawsuits.

Stroke·2023
Same author

In Reply-Electronic Health Records and Drugs Prescribed for Off-label Indications.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2017
Same author

After Amarin v FDA: What Will the Future Hold for Off-label Promotion Regulation?

Mayo Clinic proceedings·2016
Same author

Mapping of Health Communication and Education Strategies Addressing the Public Health Dangers of Illicit Online Pharmacies.

Journal of health communication·2016

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Neuroscience
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Current legal definition of death requires whole-brain death (no upper brain or brain stem function).
  • Hematologists and oncologists frequently encounter end-of-life care decisions.
  • Medical advancements necessitate re-evaluation of death definitions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the ongoing debate surrounding the legal definition of death.
  • To examine arguments for and against expanding the definition of death.
  • To highlight the implications of evolving medical technology on end-of-life definitions.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current legal statutes and medical practices.
  • Analysis of ethical arguments for and against expanding the definition of death.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the impact of technological advancements on organ donation and patient care.

    • Main Results:

    • The current legal standard for death is whole-brain death.
    • Arguments for expanding the definition include increasing organ availability and reducing healthcare costs.
    • Arguments against expansion involve concerns about misdiagnosis and adherence to traditional or religious beliefs.

    Conclusions:

    • The definition of death remains a contentious issue, particularly with advancements in medical technology.
    • The debate involves balancing potential benefits like increased organ donation against ethical and personal concerns.
    • Continued discussion is crucial as medical capabilities evolve.