Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

ECVAM's activities on computer modelling and integrated testing.

Andrew P Worth1

  • 1ECVAM, Institute for Health & Consumer Protection, European Commission Joint Research Centre, 21020 Ispra (VA), Italy.

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals : ATLA
|January 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential systemic availability classification of chemicals for safety assessment.

Environment international·2025
Same author

Report of the European Commission workshop on "The roadmap towards phasing out animal testing for chemical safety assessments", Brussels, 11-12 December 2023.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2025
Same author

Chemicals 2.0 and Why We Need to Bypass the Gold Standard in Regulatory Toxicology.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2024
Same author

A twin transition in regulatory toxicology: moving toward Chemicals 2.0 and phasing out animal testing.

Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology·2024
Same author

Towards a future regulatory framework for chemicals in the European Union - Chemicals 2.0.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2023
Same author

Use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in regulatory decisions for chemical safety: Report from an EPAA Deep Dive Workshop.

Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP·2022
Same journal

Spotlight on Three Rs Progress.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Resources Round-up.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Editorial.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

<i>Galleria mellonella</i> as an invertebrate screening model for biocompatibility and <i>in vivo</i> functionality testing of imaging contrast agents.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Data-driven science, ethics and risk: Building knowledge of key ethics-risk intersections relevant to public sector decision-making.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Conference Diary.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
See all related articles

This study outlines quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and expert systems for chemical safety testing. It proposes validation criteria for QSAR models and integrated testing strategies at the European Union level.

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Regulatory science

Background:

  • Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and expert systems are crucial for predicting chemical properties.
  • Integrated testing strategies aim to streamline chemical safety assessments.
  • Validation of predictive models is essential for regulatory acceptance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce fundamental concepts of QSAR, expert systems, and integrated testing.
  • To establish criteria for validating QSAR models based on their analogy to prediction models.
  • To summarize ECVAM's research and outline EU-level validation plans for QSAR and expert systems.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual explanation of QSAR, expert systems, and integrated testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analogy-based reasoning to derive validation criteria for QSAR models.
  • Summary of in-house research programs and future validation strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Basic principles of QSAR, expert systems, and integrated testing strategies are defined.
    • A framework for QSAR model validation is proposed.
    • ECVAM's research activities and future plans for EU-level validation are presented.

    Conclusions:

    • The paper provides a foundational understanding of QSAR and integrated testing for chemical safety.
    • Proposed validation criteria are key for the reliable application of QSAR models.
    • The outlined plans support the regulatory acceptance of QSAR and expert systems in the EU.