Minimizing risks: the ethics of predictive diabetes mellitus screening research in newborns

Lainie Friedman Ross1

  • 1Department of Pediatrics and MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 6082, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. lross@uchicago.edu

Insights

Newborn screening for type 1 diabetes (T1DM) involves ethical considerations. Research should avoid disclosing results unless a prevention strategy exists or the infant has a family history of T1DM.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Genetic Research Ethics
  • Metabolic Disease Research

Background:

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a prevalent childhood metabolic disease.
  • Newborn screening for genetic predisposition to T1DM is available in select states.
  • Current T1DM screening lacks preventive treatments, focusing on risk identification and follow-up studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the ethical implications of predictive genetic research for T1DM in newborns.
  • To address the psychosocial impact of genetic predisposition findings.
  • To propose guidelines for ethical research conduct in this area.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of predictive genetic research protocols for T1DM.
  • Review of existing newborn screening practices and their ethical frameworks.
  • Consideration of psychosocial factors in research design.

Main Results:

  • Predictive genetic research in newborns carries significant psychosocial risks.
  • Disclosure of results necessitates careful consideration of potential harm.
  • Research designs must be sensitive to the implications for infants and families.

Conclusions:

  • For T1DM predictive research without prevention, withholding results is recommended to minimize harm.
  • If result disclosure is essential, research should be limited to newborns with a first-degree relative affected by T1DM.
  • Ethical guidelines are crucial for balancing research advancement with participant welfare.