Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Behavior?00:54

What is Behavior?

Behaviors are actions that an organism engages in—they can be related to finding food, reproducing, defending against threats, and many other possible actions. Behaviors include activities related to the environment around the animal—such as migration—as well as social interactions within a species or population. Many behaviors involve motor output—that is, muscle movements—while others involve less visible actions, such as learning.
Communication01:03

Communication

Communication between two animals occurs when one animal transmits an information signal that causes a change in the animal that receives the information. Organisms communicate with one another in a host of different ways. Signals can be auditory, chemical, visual, tactile, or a combination of these. Communication is a critical behavioral adaptation that promotes survival, growth, and reproduction.
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Habitat segregation in ungulates: are males forced into suboptimal foraging habitats through indirect competition by females?

Oecologia·2017
Same author

The relationship between habitat choice and lifetime reproductive success in female red deer.

Oecologia·2017
Same author

"Leading according to need" in self-organizing groups.

The American naturalist·2009
Same author

Survey of badger access to farm buildings and facilities in relation to contact with cattle.

The Veterinary record·2008
Same author

Democracy in animals: the evolution of shared group decisions.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2007
Same author

Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal.

Ecology·2006

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
07:21

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 10, 2011

Group decision-making in animals.

L Conradt1, T J Roper

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK. l.conradt@sussex.ac.uk

Nature
|January 10, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animal groups make communal decisions, but how remains unclear. This study models despotism vs. democracy, finding democratic decisions benefit groups more by reducing extreme choices, suggesting democracy

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors
03:32

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
07:21

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 10, 2011

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors
03:32

The Large-Scale Cultivation of Nematodes to Study Their Collective Behaviors

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • Animal groups frequently face collective decisions regarding activities, timing, and navigation.
  • Understanding the mechanisms and fitness consequences of these group decisions is crucial but underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To model and compare the fitness outcomes of despotic versus democratic decision-making in animal groups.
  • To identify conditions favoring each decision-making strategy and predict their prevalence.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical modeling of fitness consequences for group members under different decision-making scenarios.
  • Analysis of costs and benefits associated with despotic and democratic processes.

Main Results:

  • Despotic decisions incur higher costs to subordinates and the group overall compared to democratic decisions.
  • Subordinates benefit from accepting a despot's decision only when group size is small and information disparity is large.
  • Democratic decisions are advantageous due to moderating extreme outcomes, not solely individual influence.

Conclusions:

  • Democratic decision-making is likely widespread in animal groups due to its fitness benefits.
  • The study provides testable predictions for empirical research on non-human group decision-making strategies.