Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic privacy.

Pamela Sankar1

  • 1Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-3308, USA. sankarp@mail.med.upenn.edu

Annual Review of Medicine
|January 15, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Four Common Beliefs About Patient Memory Evaluations: Who Has Them and What Modifies Them?

American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias·2026
Same author

Effects of caregiving experience on expectations of becoming an Alzheimer's disease caregiver in the future.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2026
Same author

An online vignette study of diagnostic testing: Racial and ethnic differences in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis confidence and stigma.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Are Knowledge and Interpersonal Contact Cures for Alzheimer's Stigma? Data From Caregivers Offer Clues.

Stigma and health·2025
Same author

A survey study of Alzheimer's stigma among Black adults: intersectionality of Black identity and biomarker diagnosis.

Ethnicity & health·2024
Same author

Double-Edged Sword: A Positive Brain Scan Result Heightens Confidence in an Alzheimer's Diagnosis But Also Leads to Higher Stigma Among Older Adults in a Vignette-Based Experiment.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2024
Same journal

Dupilumab Emerges as an Effective Antibody Therapy for Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Annual review of medicine·2026
Same journal

CAR T Cell Toxicities and Emerging Treatment Strategies.

Annual review of medicine·2026
Same journal

Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy: A Rapidly Evolving Landscape.

Annual review of medicine·2026
Same journal

Accessibility of Somatic Genetic Testing for Cancer Treatment Decisions.

Annual review of medicine·2026
Same journal

Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease: Updates in Pathophysiology and Management.

Annual review of medicine·2026
Same journal

Revascularization for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Disproving the 45-Year-Old Concept of Hibernating Myocardium.

Annual review of medicine·2026
See all related articles

Public concern over genetic privacy has surged alongside a tripling of genetic tests. Research indicates these concerns may be disproportionate to actual misuse, possibly influenced by beliefs in genetic determinism.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Bioethics
  • Public Health Policy

Background:

  • The past decade has seen a significant increase in genetic testing, leading to heightened public apprehension regarding genetic privacy.
  • Concurrent with this rise, legislative bodies have enacted numerous regulations at state and federal levels to safeguard genetic information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between the increase in genetic testing and public concerns about genetic privacy.
  • To investigate the potential overestimation of genetic privacy risks compared to documented instances of misuse.
  • To explore the role of genetic determinism beliefs in shaping public perception of genetic privacy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of genetic testing statistics over the last 10 years.
  • Analysis of legislative actions concerning genetic information protection.
Keywords:
Genetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of research findings on public concerns versus actual genetic information misuse.
  • Exploration of psychological factors, such as genetic determinism, influencing privacy perceptions.

    • Main Results:

    • Genetic testing has more than tripled in the last decade.
    • Despite extensive regulations, public concern about genetic privacy persists.
    • Research suggests that concerns about genetic privacy may be disproportionate to known incidents of information misuse.
    • Beliefs in genetic determinism are identified as a contributing factor to heightened privacy concerns.

    Conclusions:

    • While regulations are in place, public perception of genetic privacy risks may exceed the documented evidence of harm.
    • Understanding the psychological underpinnings, like genetic determinism, is crucial for addressing public concerns effectively.
    • The ongoing debate surrounding genetic testing within families highlights evolving societal responses to genetic privacy issues.