Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration (E-TTNA) for Sampling of Lung Nodules
06:03

Use of Electromagnetic Navigational Transthoracic Needle Aspiration (E-TTNA) for Sampling of Lung Nodules

Published on: May 23, 2015

Overview of methodology for lung cancer evidence review and guideline development

Douglas C McCrory1, Gene L Colice, Sandra Zelman Lewis

  • 1Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, USA. douglas.mccrory@duke.edu

Chest
|January 16, 2003
PubMed

Insights

The American College of Chest Physicians developed 20 clinical practice guidelines for lung cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. This article details the evidence-based approach used to create these comprehensive lung cancer management recommendations.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Oncology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide.
  • Clinical practice guidelines are essential for standardizing and improving patient care.
  • The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recognized the need for updated lung cancer guidelines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for lung cancer.
  • To cover key aspects of lung cancer management: prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for clinicians.

Main Methods:

  • Convening a multidisciplinary expert panel.
  • Systematic identification, evaluation, and synthesis of relevant scientific evidence.
  • Assessing the strength of evidence for each guideline.
  • Grading the recommendations based on the evidence.

Main Results:

  • Development of 20 distinct clinical practice guidelines.
  • Guidelines address a wide range of lung cancer management decisions.
  • The process involved rigorous evidence appraisal and synthesis.

Conclusions:

  • The ACCP has produced a robust set of guidelines for lung cancer care.
  • These guidelines aim to improve patient outcomes through evidence-based practice.
  • The methodology ensures transparency and reliability in recommendations.

More Related Videos

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

Related Concept Videos

Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies01:27

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies

Assessing and diagnosing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) involves a detailed approach that includes a comprehensive review of medical history, physical examination, and a variety of diagnostic tests. This thorough evaluation is essential to ensure an accurate diagnosis and guide effective management strategies.
Medical History
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...