The water load test: observations from healthy controls and patients with functional dyspepsia
Michael P Jones1, Seth Hoffman, Dhiren Shah
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2908, USA. mpjones@nmh.org
Abstract:
Gastric sensation and accommodation are studied by barostat, but this is invasive. The drink test is noninvasive and may provide similar information. We evaluated relationships between drink test, gastric function, symptoms, and psychiatric distress. Controls (73) and functional dyspeptics (FD) (92) were studied using a 5-min water load test (WL5), gastric emptying, and electrogastrography (EGG). Symptoms, quality of life, and psychiatric distress were measured using standardized measures. Controls underwent test-retest of WL5 and comparison of WL5 with 100 ml/min water-based drink test (WL100) or nutrient drink. Controls, FD, and gastroparetics estimated drinking capacity before WL5 using a visual analog scale. WL5 correlated with WL100 (r = 0.7929) but not nutrient drink test (r = 0.1995). WL5 was significantly less in FD than controls, and abnormal WL5 was seen in 46%. In FD, volume to fullness inversely correlated with symptom severity (r =-0.29; P = 0.0154) and WL5 produced more symptoms, particularly nausea. Gastric function was not different between FD with normal or abnormal WL5. Symptoms and psychiatric distress were similar between normal and abnormal WL5 groups, but the abnormal group had significantly poorer quality of life. Controls and gastroparetics had good correlation of estimated and ingested volumes, but FD did not. Versus FD with normal WL5 capacity, FD with impaired drinking capacity have normal gastric function and similar symptoms but poorer quality of life. FD are less able to predict drinking capacity. These data suggest that WL5 identifies FD with intact gastric function but abnormal visceral perception.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry


