Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence-based medicine.

R L Smyth1

  • 1Brough Professor of Paediatric Medicine, University Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK.

Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
|January 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

17q21 variant increases the risk of exacerbations in asthmatic children despite inhaled corticosteroids use.

Allergy·2018
Same author

Questioning assent: how are children's views included as families make decisions about clinical trials?

Child: care, health and development·2016
Same author

Pharmacogenetics of warfarin in a paediatric population: time in therapeutic range, initial and stable dosing and adverse effects.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2014
Same author

Respiratory syncytial virus infection of airway epithelial cells, in vivo and in vitro, supports pulmonary antibody responses by inducing expression of the B cell differentiation factor BAFF.

Thorax·2012
Same author

Primary airway epithelial cultures from children are highly permissive to respiratory syncytial virus infection.

Thorax·2011
Same author

Processes in recruitment to randomised controlled trials of medicines for children (RECRUIT): a qualitative study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2011
Same journal

Image-guided pediatric airway endoscopy: A review.

Paediatric respiratory reviews·2026
Same journal

Bronchoscopic and interventional management of tracheobronchomalacia in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a review of evidence.

Paediatric respiratory reviews·2026
Same journal

Hand in glove: New imaging techniques and airway endoscopy.

Paediatric respiratory reviews·2026
Same journal

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia associated pulmonary hypertension: implications across the lifespan.

Paediatric respiratory reviews·2026
Same journal

How to monitor response to biologics in children with severe asthma.

Paediatric respiratory reviews·2026
Same journal

Moving the goalposts from symptom control to preventing airway remodeling in preschool asthma.

Paediatric respiratory reviews·2026
See all related articles

Evidence-based medicine uses rigorous methods to find and apply the best patient care evidence, reducing errors for reliable clinical decisions. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses enhance healthcare evidence summaries for all stakeholders.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Conscientious clinicians strive to use the best available evidence for patient care.
  • Traditional clinical practice may be enhanced by systematic and rigorous methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the principles and benefits of evidence-based medicine (EBM).
  • To highlight the role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in EBM.

Main Methods:

  • Application of systematic and rigorous methodology in healthcare decision-making.
  • Critical appraisal and synthesis of available evidence.
  • Utilizing meta-analysis for precise effect estimation and systematic reviews for evidence summarization.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • An evidence-based approach limits bias and reduces random errors.
  • Meta-analysis provides more precise healthcare effect estimates than individual studies.
  • Systematic reviews offer accessible summaries of evidence-based healthcare.

    • Conclusions:

    • Evidence-based medicine provides a reliable framework for clinical decision-making.
    • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are crucial tools for advancing evidence-based healthcare.
    • Accessible evidence summaries benefit clinicians, administrators, and patients.