Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

K McCormack1, N W Scott, P M Go

  • 1Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZD. n.w.scott@abdn.ac.uk

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|January 22, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with mesh offers faster recovery and less pain compared to open surgery. However, it involves longer operation times and a higher risk of visceral and vascular injuries, with no significant difference in recurrence rates compared to open mesh repair.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Delivery Trends After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.

Irish medical journal·2025
Same author

Mesh fixation techniques for inguinal hernia repair: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2021
Same author

The data we have: Pregnancy and birth related data collection in Australia, Canada, Europe and the USA - A web-based survey of practice.

International journal of population data science·2021
Same author

A 19 year population-based cohort study analysing reoperation for recurrence following laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2019
Same author

Research and Education at the Centre for Research and Evaluation in Diagnostics (CRED), University of Sherbrooke.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2016
Same author

Analog filtering methods improve leading edge timing performance of multiplexed SiPMs.

Physics in medicine and biology·2016

Area of Science:

  • General Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • Inguinal hernia repair is a common general surgery procedure.
  • Synthetic mesh has become standard, utilized in both open and laparoscopic approaches.
  • Previous trials were often too small to definitively compare techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare minimal access laparoscopic mesh techniques with open surgical techniques for inguinal hernia repair.
  • To analyze recurrence rates, complications, and recovery times between the two methods.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.
  • Inclusion of published and unpublished trials regardless of language.
  • Individual patient data (IPD) were obtained and analyzed where possible.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic repair resulted in longer operative times but earlier return to usual activities (7 days sooner).
  • Laparoscopic repair showed reduced rates of persisting pain and numbness.
  • No significant difference in hernia recurrence was found between laparoscopic and open mesh repair; however, laparoscopic repair showed reduced recurrence compared to open non-mesh repair.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic mesh repair is associated with faster recovery and less post-operative pain and numbness.
  • While recurrence rates are similar to open mesh repair, laparoscopic techniques carry a higher risk of visceral and vascular injuries.
  • The choice between laparoscopic and open mesh repair involves balancing benefits of faster recovery against increased operative risks.