Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth.

G Nadin1, B R Goel, C A Yeung

  • 1Shetland NHS Board, Montfield Dental Clinic, Burgh Road, Lerwick, Shetland, UK, ZE1 OLA. gillnadin@ntlworld.com

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|January 22, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Limited research exists on primary molar pulp treatments. Current evidence does not reliably support one technique over another for retaining decayed primary teeth, necessitating further high-quality studies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advancing a Global Oral Health Research Agenda.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same author

Public opinion on community water fluoridation in Scotland.

British dental journal·2024
Same author

Modelling a Consultant Workforce for the United Kingdom: needs-based planning for Dental Public Health.

Community dental health·2023
Same author

Promoting oral health for refugees.

British dental journal·2023
Same author

Oral healthcare for displaced communities.

British dental journal·2022
Same author

PRISMA 2020 updated guideline.

British dental journal·2022

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Dentistry
  • Endodontics
  • Dental Public Health

Background:

  • Dental decay in primary teeth is a significant public health issue.
  • Pulp treatment is often employed for primary teeth with decay involving the pulp.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of various pulp treatment techniques in retaining primary molar teeth for at least 12 months.
  • To compare pulp treatments and extractions regarding long-term sequelae.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.
  • Searched multiple databases including Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE up to August 2002.
  • Included studies compared different pulp treatments, extraction, or no treatment for primary molars with pulp involvement.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Only three RCTs met the inclusion criteria; nine additional studies had design or analysis limitations.
  • Included trials assessed formocresol, ferric sulphate, electrosurgical pulpotomy, and zinc oxide eugenol pulpectomy.
  • No statistically significant differences in extraction rates were found between most treatments, though one study suggested caution with ferric sulphate pulpotomy.

Conclusions:

  • There is insufficient reliable evidence from RCTs to support the superiority of any specific pulp treatment technique for primary molars.
  • The optimal treatment for pulpally involved primary molars cannot be determined due to limited high-quality research.
  • High-quality RCTs with appropriate methodology are needed to guide clinical practice.