Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Sex Stratified Neuronal Cultures to Study Ischemic Cell Death Pathways
Published on: December 9, 2013
The influence of sex on pharmacokinetics
1Institute on Aging and Jewish Home of San Francisco, and University of California, San Francisco, California 94112, USA. jbsucsf@itsa.ucsf.edu
Abstract:
Biologic differences exist between men and women that can result in differences in responses to drugs. Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between the sexes exist, with more data on pharmacokinetic differences. On average, men are larger than women. Body size differences results in larger distribution volumes and faster total clearance of most medications in men compared to women. Greater body fat in women (until older ages) may increase distribution volumes for lipophilic drugs in women. Total drug absorption does not appear to be significantly affected by sex although absorption rates may be slightly slower in women. Bioavailability after oral drug dosing, for CYP3A substrates in particular, may be somewhat higher in women compared to men. Bioavailability after transdermal drug administration does not appear to be significantly affected by gender; nor does protein binding. Renal processes of glomerular filtration, tubular secretion, and tubular reabsorption appear to be faster in men compared to women whether considered on a mg/kg basis or total body weight basis. Algorithms to estimate glomerular filtration rate incorporate sex as a factor; some also include weight. For hepatic processes, drugs metabolized by Phase I metabolism (oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis via cytochrome P450's 1A, 2D6, 2E1), Phase II conjugative metabolism (glucuronidation, conjugation, glucuronyltransferases, methyltransferases, dehydrogenases) and by combined oxidative and conjugation processes are usually cleared faster in men compared to women (mg/kg basis). Metabolism by CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and N-acetyltransferase, appear to be similar in men and women (mg/kg). Clearance of p-glycoprotein substrates appear to be similar in men and women. In contrast, total clearance of a number of CYP3A substrates appear to be mildly or moderately faster (mg/kg) in women compared to men. The clinical significance of reported differences warrants consideration. Clearance reported on a per kg basis directly addresses organ or enzyme clearance. The difference in size between men and women means translating these results to clinical dosage rates should include an adjustment for body size. Unfortunately, this is not standard. Reports of sex differences that persist after considering weight may warrant further dosage adjustments. In addition, investigations are often performed in healthy fasting individuals yet medications are prescribed to patients with confounding influences of disease, co-medications, diet, and social habits. The relative role of sex on pharmacokinetics as compared to genetics, age, disease, social habits and their potential interactions in the clinical setting is not yet fully known but should be routinely considered and further studied.
More Related Videos
07:23Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities
Published on: July 29, 2014
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamics: Overview and Principles
Most drugs' effects result from their interactions with drug receptors or targets within the body. These interactions trigger specific responses at the cellular or systemic level. Drug receptors can be found on the surfaces of cells or within...
Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics: Role of Transporters
Polymorphisms occurring in drug transporters can alter...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Intensity of Dose-Effect Relationship
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Problems
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Model Components