Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Feature-specific perceptual processing dissociates action from recognition.

Liana E Brown1, Cathleen M Moore, David A Rosenbaum

  • 1Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. liana1@psu.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|January 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simon says "stay in touch": Reachability moderates the effect of irrelevant spatial congruence.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Hands can play equal roles in bimanual single-object rotations.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Saccades to spatially extended objects: The roles of observer goals and part-structure cues in determining within-object landing position.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Evidence of allocentric spatial learning in male rats with large lesions of the hippocampus.

PloS one·2026
Same author

The Effect Of Hand-Held Tool Vibration On Reaching.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2025
Same author

Pre-crastination and path planning: Evidence for cognitive frontloading, a new sibling for cognitive offloading.

Psychological research·2025

Visual processing for action and recognition differs. Action tasks efficiently used both color and disparity, while recognition tasks favored color over disparity, suggesting distinct neural pathways.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The ventral stream (recognition) prioritizes color, while the dorsal stream (action) prioritizes binocular disparity.
  • Understanding how these visual streams process different cues is crucial for comprehending visual perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether visual processing for action and recognition utilizes distinct visual cues differently.
  • To compare the efficiency of color and binocular disparity processing in action versus recognition tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed visual search tasks using displays defined by either color or disparity.
  • Action tasks involved stamping a target, while recognition tasks involved lifting an object through a gap.
  • Reaction times and hand orientation were analyzed to assess processing efficiency.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Action tasks showed equal processing efficiency for both color and disparity cues.
  • Recognition tasks demonstrated less efficient processing for disparity compared to color.
  • Disparity processing was significantly slower than color processing during recognition.

Conclusions:

  • Visual processing pathways for action and recognition are distinct.
  • The dorsal stream (action) flexibly processes color and disparity, while the ventral stream (recognition) shows a preference for color.