Related Experiment Videos
Factor specific differences in locus of control for emotionally disturbed and normal children
Journal of Personality Assessment
|February 11, 1976
Summary
Emotionally disturbed children and normal children showed similar overall locus of control. However, emotionally disturbed children reported higher helplessness, a key factor differentiating the groups.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Locus of control (LOC) is a key psychological construct.
- Understanding LOC differences in children is crucial for interventions.
- The Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale for Children assesses self-reported LOC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in locus of control between emotionally disturbed and normal children.
- To examine group differences across specific factors of the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale for Children.
- To determine the clinical relevance of specific LOC factors.
Main Methods:
- Administered the Nowicki-Strickland Locus of Control Scale for Children to two groups: 20 normal children and 20 emotionally disturbed children.
- Calculated overall locus of control scores and scores for each of the five factors.
- Utilized separate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to compare group means on each factor.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were found between emotionally disturbed and normal children on overall locus of control.
- Four out of five factors of the scale did not differentiate the two groups.
- Emotionally disturbed children scored significantly higher on the 'Helplessness' factor, indicating greater endorsement of helplessness items.
Conclusions:
- Overall locus of control is not a distinguishing factor between emotionally disturbed and normal children in this sample.
- The 'Helplessness' factor of locus of control is a significant differentiator, highlighting its clinical relevance.
- Factor-specific analysis is important for understanding nuanced psychological differences in clinical populations.