Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Policy intervention.

Richard Scheffler1, Mary Durham, Tom McGuire

  • 1University of California, Berkeley, 2150 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 525, Berkeley, California 94720-7380, USA. rscheff@uclink4.berkeley.edu

Mental Health Services Research
|February 1, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Usability, Relevance, and User Engagement of a Government-Sponsored and Community Co-Designed Digital Mental Health Website During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study on Latino/a/x Adults.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Private equity investments in health care in OECD countries: an exploratory analysis.

Health economics, policy, and law·2026
Same author

Effective Components of Collaborative Care for Depression in Primary Care: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

JAMA psychiatry·2025
Same author

Community Leadership Institute for Equity: Planning Processes and Procedures to Develop Partnered Conferences.

Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action·2024
Same author

Community Members' Perceptions of a Resource-Rich Well-Being Website in California During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.

JMIR formative research·2024
Same author

Impact of Opera on Resilience and Thriving in Serious Mental Illness: Pilot Evaluation of The Center Cannot Hold Part 2 and Resilience Workshop.

Community mental health journal·2024
Same journal

The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children's mental health treatments.

Mental health services research·2005
Same journal

Treatment for dual diagnosis patients in the psychiatric and substance abuse systems.

Mental health services research·2005
Same journal

Relationship between preventative physical health care and mental health in individuals with schizophrenia: a survey of caregivers.

Mental health services research·2005
Same journal

Improving mental health assessment and service planning practices for older adults: a controlled comparison study.

Mental health services research·2005
Same journal

Child behavioral health service use and caregiver strain: comparison of managed care and fee-for-service Medicaid systems.

Mental health services research·2005
Same journal

Exploring the relationship between race/ethnicity, age of first school-based services utilization, and age of first specialty mental health care for at-risk youth.

Mental health services research·2005
See all related articles

This study examines market failures and policy issues in affective disorder care. Solutions are proposed to improve treatment quality and reduce illness burden through legislative and healthcare system reforms.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Public policy
  • Mental health services research

Background:

  • Affective disorders represent a significant public health burden.
  • Market failures, including externalities and information asymmetries, impede high-quality care.
  • Existing parity legislation, managed care, Medicare, and Medicaid present policy challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and address market failures and public policy problems in affective disorder care.
  • To delineate specific issues within parity legislation, managed care, Medicare, and Medicaid.
  • To develop a research agenda for effective public policy formulation and implementation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing literature on health economics and mental health policy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of current legislative and healthcare system structures.
  • Identification of policy gaps and areas for improvement.

    • Main Results:

    • Key market failures and information asymmetries impacting affective disorder care were identified.
    • Specific deficiencies in parity legislation, managed care, Medicare, and Medicaid were delineated.
    • A framework for a public policy research agenda was established.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing market failures and policy issues is crucial for ensuring high-quality affective disorder care.
    • Reforms in legislation and healthcare systems are necessary to reduce the burden of affective disorders.
    • A structured research agenda will guide the development and implementation of effective public policies.