Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Job-decision inconsistencies involving social comparison information: the role of dominating alternatives
Ann E Tenbrunsel1, Kristina A Diekmann
1Management Department, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Indiana 46556-0399, USA. ann.e.tenbrunsel.1@nd.edu
Abstract:
Previous research on joint versus separate preference reversals has demonstrated that individuals focus on social comparison information when they are evaluating a single option but focus on absolute salary when they are considering more than 1 option. Study 1 demonstrates that social comparison information is important in multiple option scenarios when an option favorable on social comparison dominates an inferior, 3rd alternative. Study 2 examines why dominating alternatives are so attractive by investigating the role that the value-shift, weight-change, and emergent-value models play in explaining the pattern of results obtained in Study 1. Results provide support for the value-shift and emergent-value models and further suggest that these 2 models may be interrelated, with justification (emergent-value model) mediating the relationship between the attractiveness of the attributes (value-shift model) and the attractiveness of the dominating alternative.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Confirmation Biases
Cognitive Dissonance
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect