Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bite marks.

Stuart L Fischman1

  • 1Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, State University of New York, 355 Squire Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214-3008, USA. fischman@buffalo.edu

The Alpha Omegan
|February 4, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents a simple method for evaluating bite mark evidence. Using life-size photographs and study models allows for direct comparison, making findings easier for juries to understand.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How the insightful leadership of James English transformed a traditional dental school into a leading educational institution.

Journal of the history of dentistry·2014
Same author

Alpha Omega in Riga, Latvia.

The Alpha omegan·2010
Same author

You had to be there to believe it!

The Alpha omegan·2006
Same author

Use of essential oil-containing mouthrinses by xerostomic individuals: determination of potential for oral mucosal irritation.

American journal of dentistry·2004
Same author

Mid-line swelling of the palate.

The Journal of laryngology and otology·2004
Same author

Dental profile of patients with Gaucher disease.

BMC oral health·2003

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Odontology
  • Legal Medicine
  • Evidence Analysis

Background:

  • Traditional bite mark analysis methods can be complex and difficult for laypersons to understand.
  • The need for clear and accessible methods in presenting forensic evidence to juries is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe a simple and practical method for evaluating bite mark evidence.
  • To offer an alternative to complicated analytical procedures in bite mark analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes a "Keep It Simple, Stupid" (KISS) principle.
  • Involves direct comparison of study models with one-to-one life-size photographs of bite mark evidence.
  • Facilitates hands-on examination by jurors.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The proposed method allows for direct visual matching of teeth and bite marks.
  • This approach simplifies data summation and interpretation for legal proceedings.
  • Enhances juror comprehension of bite mark evidence.

Conclusions:

  • A straightforward bite mark evaluation technique can be effectively employed in legal settings.
  • The method prioritizes clarity and accessibility for jury understanding.
  • Complex analytical procedures are reserved for situations demanding higher specificity.