Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Some limits of informed consent.

O O'Neill1

  • 1Newnham College, Cambridge University, UK.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|February 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Informed consent in medical ethics is crucial for preventing patient deception and coercion, not just autonomy. Procedures should empower patients with control over information and the ability to withdraw consent.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Insurance and genetics: the current state of play.

The Modern law review·2003
Same author

Practical principles & practical judgment.

The Hastings Center report·2003
Same author

Use of decompressive craniectomy after severe head trauma.

AORN journal·2002
Same author

The efficacy of oral analgesia for postoperative pain.

The British journal of theatre nursing : NATNews : the official journal of the National Association of Theatre Nurses·1999
Same author

Endovascular treatment of traumatic dural sinus thrombosis: case report.

Neurosurgery·1998
Same author

Genetic information and insurance: some ethical issues.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·1997
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Patient Rights

Background:

  • Traditional views on informed consent emphasize individual autonomy.
  • However, various interpretations of autonomy exist, complicating its ethical weight.
  • A more robust justification for informed consent lies in safeguarding against deception and coercion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the ethical underpinnings of informed consent.
  • To address limitations in current debates on generic versus specific consent, particularly for human tissue research.
  • To propose a framework for informed consent that prioritizes the prevention of deception and coercion.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of informed consent and autonomy.
  • Critique of existing ethical arguments regarding consent.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of practical implications for consent procedures in research settings.

    • Main Results:

    • The value of informed consent is better understood as a safeguard against deception and coercion.
    • The concept of complete, specific consent is philosophically problematic.
    • Current debates on consent specificity do not adequately address the core issue of preventing manipulation.

    Conclusions:

    • Informed consent procedures should be designed to minimize deception and coercion.
    • Patients should have control over the information they receive.
    • The ability to withdraw consent is a critical component of ethical consent processes.