Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG35-55) Induced Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis (EAE) in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: April 15, 2014
Misled and confused? Telling the public about MMR vaccine safety. Measles, mumps, and rubella
1Department of Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. clementscj@who.ch
Abstract:
The extraordinary events surrounding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in the United Kingdom have not only placed in jeopardy the use of this triple vaccine but have also spread concern to other parts of the world. Examination of the public's worry about MMR vaccine reveals they have been exposed to a range of conflicting views resulting in the feeling of having been misled about the safety of the vaccine. There are various groups and individuals who have legitimate roles in informing the public about such subjects. But is each one behaving in an ethically responsible way? And if confidence falters, vaccine coverage dips, and an outbreak of measles, mumps, or rubella ensues, who, if anyone, will stand and say "I misled them, I confused them, this is my responsibility"? We examine the ethical issues of each group with a voice in the debate about vaccine safety.
Insights
Public concern over the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine stems from conflicting information, leaving individuals feeling misled about its safety. This ethical examination questions the responsibility of those influencing public vaccine confidence and potential consequences of misinformation.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Vaccinology
- Bioethics
Background:
- The United Kingdom experienced significant public concern regarding the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine.
- This concern has impacted vaccine confidence globally and raised questions about vaccine safety communication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the ethical responsibilities of various groups and individuals involved in communicating information about MMR vaccine safety.
- To explore the consequences of public mistrust in vaccines, including decreased coverage and potential outbreaks.
Main Methods:
- Ethical analysis of information dissemination regarding MMR vaccine safety.
- Review of public discourse and media representation of vaccine risks and benefits.
Main Results:
- Conflicting information has led the public to feel misled about MMR vaccine safety.
- The ethical conduct of information providers in the vaccine debate is questioned.
Conclusions:
- Misinformation and ethical lapses in communication can erode public trust in vaccines.
- Accountability for misleading the public and the subsequent impact on public health outcomes needs to be addressed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Vaccines
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever
Poliomyelitis
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease

