Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions.

M E J L Hulscher1, M G H Laurant, R P T M Grol

  • 1Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), University Medical Centre Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. M.Hulscher@wok.umcn.nl

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|February 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Process evaluation of an effective Antimicrobial Stewardship intervention in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE·2026
Same author

Follow-up of patients with urinary tract infections discharged from the emergency department: a mixed methods study.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2024
Same author

Use of a smartphone app to inform healthcare workers of hospital policy during a pandemic such as COVID-19: A mixed methods observational study.

PloS one·2022
Same author

The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence.

PloS one·2021
Same author

Proxy indicators to estimate the appropriateness of medications prescribed by paediatricians in infectious diseases: a cross-sectional observational study based on reimbursement data.

JAC-antimicrobial resistance·2021
Same author

A multicentre cluster-randomized clinical trial to improve antibiotic use and reduce length of stay in hospitals: comparison of three measurement and feedback methods.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2021

Understanding quality improvement (QI) intervention success requires detailed process evaluations. This framework analyzes factors like target groups and information delivery to guide intervention design and implementation.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Implementation Science

Background:

  • Designing effective quality improvement (QI) interventions necessitates understanding implementation processes.
  • Process evaluation is key to elucidating mechanisms behind intervention outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a framework for analyzing features of QI interventions that influence success.
  • To guide detailed process evaluations of QI interventions.

Main Methods:

  • The paper proposes a framework examining intervention success factors.
  • Key features include target group characteristics, implementer roles, activity frequency, and information content.

Main Results:

  • The framework facilitates detailed intervention description.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It enables assessment of actual exposure and participant experiences.
  • The framework is adaptable for various QI project scales.
  • Conclusions:

    • Process evaluation is essential for successful QI intervention design and implementation.
    • The proposed framework offers a structured approach to understanding intervention dynamics.
    • Effective QI requires careful consideration of intervention components and context.