Comparison of fetal growth estimates based on birth weight and ultrasound references

To compare three different methods for modeling fetal weight gain during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Ultrasound and live birth weight data were used to construct three models for defining fetal growth during the third trimester: longitudinal ultrasound estimates of fetal weight obtained serially at 3-4 week intervals in 50 uncomplicated, well-dated pregnancies between 19 and 40 weeks' gestation; cross-sectional ultrasound estimates of fetal weight obtained from 2018 ultrasound examinations of singleton, non-anomalous fetuses between 24 and 39 weeks' gestation; and cross-sectional birth weight data obtained from 9553 live singleton, non-anomalous neonates between 24 and 43 completed weeks. Analysis was performed by pairwise partial f test to compare regression curves and zeta test for comparison of mean weekly weight gain. A value of p < 0.05 was accepted for significance.

Derived regression lines depicting fetal size across gestation were significantly different from each other (f tests, p < 0.05). Estimates of mean fetal weight were significantly different between the three different models at specific gestational ages. Significant weekly variations in fetal weight gain were observed within the raw cross-sectional data sets, both for ultrasound-estimated fetal weight (range 91-278 g/week) and birth weight (65-309 g/week).

Each of the methods used to model normal fetal weight gain in the third trimester defined a distinct pattern of fetal growth. Normal fetal growth, defined longitudinally, was most closely matched by a combination of cross-sectional ultrasound-derived estimated fetal weight in preterm gestation below 34 weeks' gestation and live birth weight at or beyond 34 weeks.