Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The evaluation of quality assurance: developing and testing practical methods for managers.

Tessie Tzavaras Catsambas1, Ed Kelley, Stephane Legros

  • 1EnCompass LLC, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA. tcatsambas@encompassworld.com

International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
|February 8, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breaking barriers: assessing the impact of clinical quality improvements on reducing health disparities in hypertension care among Mumbai's urban slums.

BMJ open quality·2024
Same author

Assessing the Feasibility and Effects of Introducing the USA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program on Clinical Outcomes and Cost in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Study.

Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare·2023
Same author

Lessons learnt from quality improvement collaboratives in Cambodia.

BMJ global health·2022
Same author

The global pool of simulation exercise materials in health emergency preparedness and response: a scoping review with a health system perspective.

BMJ global health·2019
Same author

Impact of levosimendan on weaning from peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in intensive care unit.

Annals of intensive care·2019
Same author

After Astana: building the economic case for increased investment in primary health care.

Lancet (London, England)·2018

This research and development study created a flexible evaluation guide for healthcare quality assurance (QA) programs. The guide, tested in three countries, aids in assessing QA activities and structures effectively.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement Science
  • Program Evaluation Methodologies

Background:

  • Healthcare quality assurance (QA) programs require robust evaluation methods to ensure effectiveness.
  • Existing evaluation approaches may lack flexibility to adapt to diverse health system contexts.
  • A systematic approach is needed to assess QA activities across different levels of healthcare delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comprehensive approach for evaluating healthcare quality assurance (QA) activities and programs.
  • To test and refine various evaluation methods within real-world healthcare settings.
  • To create a flexible guide adaptable to diverse national and regional contexts.

Main Methods:

  • A research and development (R&D) approach involving literature review and clarification of critical QA issues.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a flexible evaluation guide with an implementation outline, evaluation matrix, and tools.
  • Field-testing and adaptation of the guide and evaluation tools (self-assessment, appreciative evaluation) in Zambia, Niger, and Chile.

    • Main Results:

    • A versatile evaluation guide was developed, featuring an implementation outline, an evaluation matrix, and an appendix of tools.
    • The guide facilitates agreement on evaluation scope, design, and methods planning.
    • It enables comprehensive assessment of QA history, advocacy, culture, structure, activities, and accomplishments.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed evaluation guide is adaptable to diverse healthcare quality assurance programs with varying structures and contexts.
    • The guide provides a structured framework, including implementation steps, checklists, and model forms.
    • The evaluation matrix aids in selecting appropriate methods and building a tailored evaluation approach.