Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Induction of Protein Deletion Through In Utero Electroporation to Define Deficits in Neuronal Migration in Transgenic Models
Published on: January 12, 2015
[Disturbances of neuroblast migration and amniocentesis. An under diagnosed problem?]
J M Prats Viñas1, C Garaizar, M J Martínez González
1Hospital de Cruces, Barakaldo, España. jprats@hcru.osakidetza.net
Introduction:
Performing amniocentesis between the fourth and sixth months of gestation is a widespread practice. However, it can entail serious consequences, apart from the loss of the foetus, such as injuries to the developing central nervous system.
Case Reports:
Over the past few years we have dealt with four patients who were carriers of a focal disturbance of neuroblast migration, which could have its origins in amniocentesis. Two patients displayed mental retardation and difficult to treat epilepsy, while the other two only presented hemiparesis. In two cases the right hemisphere of the brain was affected. One of them also presented extracranial brain tissue, which was possibly extruded during the accidental puncture of the skull.
Conclusions:
Despite its being rarely mentioned in the literature, a direct or indirect attack on the brain during diagnostic amniocentesis is a possibility that must be borne in mind when considering the use of this technique
More Related Videos
08:22A Novel Strategy Combining Array-CGH, Whole-exome Sequencing and In Utero Electroporation in Rodents to Identify Causative Genes for Brain Malformations
Published on: December 1, 2017
08:50A Murine Model of Fetal Exposure to Maternal Inflammation to Study the Effects of Acute Chorioamnionitis on Newborn Intestinal Development
Published on: June 24, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Neurulation
Nondisjunction
Teratogenicity