Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 21, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
[Rational assessment and therapy of diarrhea]
1Medizinische Klinik, Kantonsspital Luzern. dominique.criblez@ksl.ch
This article presents a practical algorithm to help doctors manage patients with diarrhea. It outlines steps for diagnosis and treatment, emphasizing the use of patient history, physical exams, and basic lab tests. The goal is to streamline the diagnostic process and avoid unnecessary tests, especially in chronic cases. The algorithm is designed to guide clinicians through initial steps and when to consider further investigations or therapeutic trials. The authors suggest this approach improves diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in both acute and chronic diarrhea cases.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology and hepatology
- Clinical diagnostic methods
- Internal medicine
Background:
Diarrhea presents a diagnostic challenge due to its wide range of possible causes. While some cases can be quickly identified using patient history and basic tests, others require more detailed investigation. Prior research has shown that acute diarrhea often has infectious origins, while chronic cases may involve functional or structural abnormalities. No prior work had resolved the need for a streamlined approach to diagnosis and treatment. This gap motivated the development of a practical algorithm for clinicians. The algorithm aims to simplify the process of identifying the underlying cause of diarrhea. It also seeks to guide therapeutic trials in cases where initial assessments are inconclusive. The focus remains on improving diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency. This paper contributes a structured framework for managing diarrhea in clinical settings.
Purpose Of The Study:
This tutorial article aims to provide a practical algorithm for clinicians managing diarrhea. The goal is to streamline diagnostic steps and therapeutic trials. The study addresses the challenge of identifying chronic diarrhea causes. It also seeks to improve clinical decision-making in complex cases. The authors propose a structured approach to avoid unnecessary testing. The algorithm is intended to enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient outcomes. It is designed for use in both primary and specialist care settings. The study emphasizes the importance of a logical diagnostic sequence.
Main Methods:
The authors review patient history, physical examination, and basic laboratory tests as initial steps. They propose a structured algorithm for diagnosing diarrhea. The method includes assessing stool characteristics and frequency. It also incorporates imaging and endoscopic investigations when needed. The algorithm considers both infectious and non-infectious causes. It outlines criteria for initiating therapeutic trials. The approach integrates clinical judgment with diagnostic testing. The method is intended to be adaptable to various clinical scenarios.
Main Results:
The proposed algorithm successfully guides clinicians through initial diagnostic steps. It emphasizes the importance of patient history and physical examination. Basic laboratory tests are recommended to rule out common causes. The algorithm includes criteria for determining when to pursue further testing. It suggests therapeutic trials for suspected functional diarrhea. The method reduces the need for extensive and unnecessary investigations. The algorithm is structured to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. It provides a framework for both acute and chronic diarrhea management.
Conclusions:
The authors propose a practical algorithm to guide diagnosis and treatment of diarrhea. The method emphasizes initial steps like history and basic tests. It suggests a structured approach to avoid unnecessary investigations. The algorithm is designed to improve diagnostic efficiency and patient outcomes. It includes criteria for initiating therapeutic trials. The framework is adaptable to various clinical settings. The study highlights the importance of a logical diagnostic sequence. The authors suggest that this approach enhances clinical decision-making.
Frequently Asked Questions
The main outcome is improved diagnostic efficiency and reduced unnecessary investigations.
The algorithm uses patient history, physical examination, and basic lab tests to guide further investigations.
Patient history helps identify potential causes and guides the need for additional testing.
Basic tests help rule out common causes like infections or malabsorption.
The algorithm suggests therapeutic trials for suspected functional causes.
The authors propose it enhances clinical decision-making and improves patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Adsorbents as Antidiarrheal Agents
Adsorbents...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Irritable Bowel Syndrome III: Medical and Nursing Management
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

