Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Procedures for Rat in situ Skeletal Muscle Contractile Properties
Published on: October 15, 2011
The effect of single twitch and train-of-four stimulation on twitch forces during stable neuromuscular block
G van Santen1, V Fidler, M C Houwertjes
1Research Group for Experimental Anesthesiology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Objective:
We investigated whether the response to a single twitch (ST) stimulus or the first response (T1) to a train-of-four (TOF; 4 stimuli at 2 Hz) stimulus following a stimulus interval of 10 s (i.e., the time between two consecutive ST or TOF stimuli) is influenced by the preceding stimulus in the presence of a stable 50% neuromuscular block. In addition, we determined whether ST and TOF stimulation yield different results under these circumstances.
Methods:
Twitch forces were measured in both tibialis anterior muscles of six cats. In the presence of a stable 50% neuromuscular block the stimulation pattern (ST or TOF) or stimulus interval (3.3, 10 or 30 s) was varied every 30 min. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis.
Results:
ST forces with a stimulus interval of 3.3 s were 10.3% (95% CI: 7.3-13.3%) smaller than those with a stimulus interval of 10 s. For T1 forces this effect was 15.2% (95% CI: 12-18.4%). There was no significant difference between twitch forces with stimulus intervals of 30 and 10 s. For a stimulus interval of 3.3 s the ST forces exceeded the T1 forces by 7.6% (95% CI: 4.4-10.8%); no significant differences were found between the ST and T1 forces for stimulus intervals of 10 and 30 s.
Conclusions:
The ST or T1 force during stimulation with a stimulus interval of 10 s or more during a stable 50% neuromuscular block in the tibialis anterior muscle of the cat is not affected by the preceding stimulus. In addition, ST and T1 forces do not differ when employing a stimulus interval of 10 s or more under these circumstances. Our results thus indicate that the known differences between ST and T1 forces after a bolus injection of a muscle relaxant can not be explained by differences in acetylcholine release when the stimulus interval exceeds 10 s.
More Related Videos
04:30Stimulated Single Fiber Electromyography (SFEMG) for Assessing Neuromuscular Junction Transmission in Rodent Models
Published on: March 8, 2024
13:07Simultaneous Intracellular Recording of a Lumbar Motoneuron and the Force Produced by its Motor Unit in the Adult Mouse In vivo
Published on: December 5, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade
Relaxation of Skeletal Muscles
When an action potential reaches the axon terminal, it depolarizes the membrane and opens voltage-gated sodium channels. Sodium ions enter the cell, further depolarizing the presynaptic membrane. This depolarization causes voltage-gated calcium channels to open.
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...