Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three-dimensional load analysis of indentation stimulators.

Geoffrey M Bove1, Daniel R Robichaud, Peter Grigg

  • 1Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Dana 721, Boston, MA 02215, USA. gbove@caregroup.harvard.edu

Journal of Neuroscience Methods
|February 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated indentation stimulators, finding electromechanical devices offer the most consistent and controlled loads. Filament and spring gauge indenters showed variability, especially off-axis loads, impacting accuracy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Model to guide force-based manipulation research and practice.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Evaluating massage therapy for radiation-induced fibrosis in rats: preliminary findings and palpation results.

Cancer biology & therapy·2024
Same author

Partial mixed neuropathy of the fourth lumbar spinal nerve misdiagnosed as "shin splints."

The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association·2023
Same author

Manual Therapy Facilitates Homeostatic Adaptation to Bone Microstructural Declines Induced by a Rat Model of Repetitive Forceful Task.

International journal of molecular sciences·2022
Same author

Manual Therapy Research Methods in Animal Models, Focusing on Soft Tissues.

Frontiers in integrative neuroscience·2022
Same author

Aberrant Neuronal Activity in a Model of Work-Related Upper Limb Pain and Dysfunction.

The journal of pain·2021

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Accurate indentation force application is crucial for various biomechanical and material science applications.
  • Existing indentation stimulators, including filament and spring gauge types, exhibit limitations in load control and consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the performance characteristics of three types of indentation stimulators: filament indenters, spring gauge indenters, and electromechanical stimulators.
  • To quantify the on-axis and off-axis loads produced by each device under controlled conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Actuation of filament indenters, a spring gauge indenter, and an electromechanical stimulator against a 3-direction load cell.
  • Systematic analysis of on-axis and off-axis loads generated by each device, considering factors like buckling and handle offset.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Filament indenters produced buckling-independent on-axis loads, but off-axis loads increased with buckling (up to 25% of on-axis).
  • Spring gauge indenters, particularly when hand-held, generated significant off-axis loads, leading to underestimation of true on-axis loads.
  • Electromechanical stimulators demonstrated high load consistency and minimal off-axis loads when properly configured.

Conclusions:

  • Electromechanical stimulators provide superior precision and consistency for indentation force application compared to filament and spring gauge types.
  • Variability in off-axis loads from filament and spring gauge indenters can compromise measurement accuracy, especially in hand-held applications.