Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Trends in the surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation
Chad E Hamner1, Thoralf M Sundt
1Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Insights
The optimal surgical strategy for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is debated. Addressing the valve directly may improve survival, but repair versus replacement remains unclear.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) presents a complex surgical challenge with debated optimal management strategies.
- Poor late survival in IMR patients is recognized, but the impact of direct valve intervention remains uncertain.
- Current understanding of IMR pathogenesis focuses on ventricular geometry, yet annuloplasty alone is the common surgical approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the controversies surrounding surgical interventions for ischemic mitral regurgitation.
- To evaluate whether coronary artery bypass grafting alone is sufficient or if valve intervention is necessary.
- To determine the optimal surgical approach, including repair versus replacement, for IMR.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing clinical information from retrospective studies.
- Analysis of the current understanding of IMR mechanisms and treatment modalities.
- Discussion of the limitations and biases inherent in available data.
Main Results:
- The optimal surgical strategy for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) remains controversial.
- The benefit of direct valve intervention on late survival in IMR patients is not well established.
- The efficacy of current approaches, such as annuloplasty, and the potential need for ventricular remodeling are unclear.
Conclusions:
- Further research is needed to clarify the best surgical approach for ischemic mitral regurgitation.
- Distinguishing between acute and chronic disease, and active ischemia versus infarction, is crucial for accurate assessment.
- Increased focus on this clinically significant entity is driving progress in understanding and management.
Abstract:
The surgical approach to ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) remains a topic of considerable controversy. Will coronary artery bypass alone suffice, or should the valve be intervened upon? The poor late survival of patients with IMR is well recognized, but it remains unknown if this can be altered by addressing the valve directly. And if surgery is undertaken, should the valve be repaired or replaced? The underlying mechanisms of IMR remain incompletely understood, and although current theory focuses on the role of alterations in ventricular geometry in its pathogenesis, IMR is most often addressed by annuloplasty alone. Is this sufficient, or does the ventricle itself require "remodeling?" The debate is confounded by imprecise terminology that fails to distinguish between acute and chronic disease, and active ischemia from completed infarction. Available clinical information is from retrospective studies with all of their inherent limitations and potential for bias. Still, progress is being made as increasing attention is focused on this clinically important entity.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

