Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Bias01:22

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Correspondence Bias01:17

Correspondence Bias

Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Survey on Transit Map Layout - from Design, Machine, and Human Perspectives.

Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics·2020
Same author

Deductive reasoning in children with specific language impairment.

The British journal of developmental psychology·2010
Same author

Explaining inappropriate strategy selection in a simple reasoning task.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2007
Same author

Expanding the universe of categorical syllogisms: a challenge for reasoning researchers.

Behavior research methods·2006
Same author

Categorical reasoning from multiple diagrams.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same author

The elusive matching bias effect in the disjunctive selection task.

Experimental psychology·2002

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Belief bias and relational reasoning.

Maxwell J Roberts1, Elizabeth D A Sykes

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. mjr@essex.ac.uk

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|February 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary

People’s beliefs influence their logical reasoning, favoring believable conclusions over valid ones in syllogism tasks. This study explored if belief bias also affects relational inference, finding it does, with presentation influencing the effect size.

More Related Videos

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Reasoning
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Belief bias is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals favor believable conclusions over logically valid ones in categorical syllogisms.
  • This bias is particularly pronounced for invalid conclusions that seem plausible.
  • Previous research has primarily focused on categorical syllogisms, leaving relational inference tasks less explored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether belief bias effects are present in relational inference tasks.
  • To determine if the presentation format influences the magnitude of belief bias in relational reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using relational inference tasks, including temporal and spatial reasoning.
  • Participants evaluated the validity of conclusions based on given premises.
  • The study examined how the believability of conclusions affected judgments of validity.

Main Results:

  • Belief bias effects were replicated in the relational inference task, similar to findings in categorical syllogisms.
  • The magnitude of the belief bias effect was found to be dependent on task presentation.
  • This presentation-dependent effect is a novel finding not easily explained by current belief bias theories.

Conclusions:

  • Belief bias is not limited to categorical syllogisms but also influences relational inference.
  • Task presentation is a critical factor affecting the strength of belief bias in reasoning.
  • Further theoretical development is needed to account for the influence of presentation format on belief bias.