Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of five methods for preparing blood smears.

R E Wenk

    The American Journal of Medical Technology
    |March 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary

    Comparing blood smear methods, spinner devices altered leukocyte counts and red cell morphology. The mechanical wedge method closely resembled traditional techniques, offering a practical alternative for blood smear preparation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Haemoglobin A1c in donor erythrocytes.

    Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2011
    Same author

    Sporadic genotype recycling fraud in relationship testing of immigrants.

    Transfusion·2010
    Same author

    Alloimmunization to the D antigen by a patient with weak D type 21.

    Immunohematology·2010
    Same author

    Chyloperitoneum in a peritoneal dialysis patient.

    American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2001
    Same author

    Erythrocyte Fy antigen phenotyping helps differentiate so-called benign tertian malarias.

    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2000
    Same author

    Distinguishing full siblings from half-siblings in limited pedigrees.

    Transfusion·2000

    Area of Science:

    • Hematology
    • Laboratory Medicine
    • Diagnostic Cytology

    Background:

    • Accurate blood smear preparation is crucial for reliable hematological analysis.
    • Traditional methods like coverslip and manual wedge preparations are widely used but can be labor-intensive.
    • Automated and mechanical devices aim to improve efficiency and consistency in smear quality.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the efficacy of three mechanical blood smear devices against traditional coverslip and manual wedge methods.
    • To evaluate the impact of different preparation methods on leukocyte differential counts, red blood cell morphology, and platelet distribution.

    Main Methods:

    • Five blood smear preparation methods were evaluated: three mechanical devices, one coverslip method, and one manual wedge method.
    • Standardized procedures were used to prepare five slides per blood sample.
    • Quantitative analysis included 100-cell leukocyte differential counts, assessment of red blood cell morphology, and platelet distribution patterns.

    Main Results:

    • No significant differences in differential counts were observed along the slide axis or margins across methods.
    • Spinner preparations showed significantly fewer neutrophils and higher lymphocyte counts.
    • Spinner methods increased smudge cells in normal and granulocytic leukemia, but decreased them in lymphocytic leukemia.
    • Spinner methods increased target cells, spherocytes, and cells with shifted pallor, while decreasing burr cells and ovalocytes compared to reference methods.
    • The mechanical wedge device demonstrated the most similarity to the reference methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Spinner-based blood smear preparations significantly alter leukocyte differentials and red blood cell morphology.
    • The mechanical wedge device offers a practical alternative, closely mimicking traditional reference methods.
    • Coverslip preparation provides no significant practical advantage over wedge methods for routine blood smear analysis.

    Related Experiment Videos