Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Planning of saccadic eye movements.

Jüri Allik1, Mai Toom, Aavo Luuk

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tiigi 78, Tartu 50410, Estonia. jyri@psych.ut.ee

Psychological Research
|February 18, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Saccadic eye movements (SEM) programming involves separate direction and amplitude control. This study shows these parameters are processed independently, not in conjunction, impacting saccadic reaction time (SRT).

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Loneliness and Personality: Noise- and Bias-Free True Correlations Between Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Domains.

Journal of personality·2026
Same author

Robust inference and widespread genetic correlates from a large-scale genetic association study of human personality.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Skin conductance response and habituation to emotional facial expressions and words.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

Most people's life satisfaction matches their personality traits: True correlations in multitrait, multirater, multisample data.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2024
Same author

Self- and informant-reported personality traits and vaccination against COVID-19.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Processing emotions from faces and words measured by event-related brain potentials.

Cognition & emotion·2023

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Theories on saccadic eye movements (SEM) programming debate whether direction and amplitude are controlled separately or together.
  • Understanding the distinct processing of SEM parameters is crucial for explaining motor control and planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the direction and amplitude of saccadic eye movements are programmed independently or in conjunction.
  • To determine the temporal dynamics of direction and amplitude specification in SEM.

Main Methods:

  • Saccadic reaction time (SRT) was measured under conditions where information on movement amplitude and direction became available at different times.
  • A growth-process (accumulator) model was used to quantitatively analyze SRT changes.

Main Results:

  • Providing information on either direction or amplitude earlier than the other significantly reduced SRT, indicating separate processing.
  • While amplitude programming was faster in isolation, direction programming became faster when both parameters needed simultaneous specification.
  • The findings support a model where SEM begins when both separate direction and amplitude neural activities reach a threshold.

Conclusions:

  • Direction and amplitude of saccadic eye movements are processed separately, not in conjunction or a fixed serial order.
  • An additional processing stage beyond motor maps is necessary for the separable programming of SEM basic parameters.
  • These findings advance our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying eye movement control.

Related Experiment Videos