Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time course of processes and representations supporting visual object identification and memory.

Haline E Schendan1, Marta Kutas

  • 1Tufts University. schendan@bu.edu

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|February 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Late Positive Potentials as an Index of "Desirably Difficult" Learning Processes Engaged During Language Comprehension: ERP Evidence From Studies of Domain Knowledge.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Unveiling Early Signs of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Through ERP Analysis with Weighted Visibility Graphs and Ensemble Learning.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Memory-related brain potentials for visual objects in early AD show impairment and compensatory mechanisms.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2024
Same author

Flexible Conceptual Representations.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Nuances of knowing: Brain potentials reveal implicit effects of domain knowledge on word processing in the absence of sentence-level knowledge.

Psychophysiology·2023
Same author

Comprehending surprising sentences: sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2022

Event-related potentials (ERPs) reveal the timing of visual object identification and memory processes. Early ERPs show form specificity, supporting multiple-view models and mental rotation, while later waves reflect memory retrieval.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Understanding the neural basis of visual object recognition and memory is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Previous research suggests distinct processes underlie object identification and memory recall.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer high temporal resolution to track neural dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the temporal dynamics of neural processes supporting visual object identification and memory.
  • To examine how object view (canonical vs. unusual) influences these neural processes.
  • To differentiate the timing of identification-related processes from memory-related processes.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) in 66 young adults.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants named objects presented in canonical or unusual views during a study phase.
  • An indirect memory test assessed recognition with same or different views from the study phase.

    • Main Results:

    • The earliest ERP repetition and format effects emerged around 150 msec.
    • Multiple ERP repetition effects occurred over time, predominantly for same views.
    • Early ERP effects (148-400 msec) indicated form specificity, supporting multiple-view and mental rotation models.
    • Later ERP components (N350, N400/P600) suggested object model selection and view transformation timing.
    • A late slow wave was more pronounced for different views, indicating a distinct memory process.

    Conclusions:

    • ERP data demonstrate sequential activation of multiple memory processes during an indirect test.
    • Early neural processes (148-400 msec) are form-specific, aligning with identification mechanisms.
    • Object identification involves processes like model selection and mental rotation, with specific temporal signatures.
    • Distinct neural mechanisms underlie memory retrieval, influenced by the consistency of object views across study and test phases.