Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

On-line syntactic processing in aphasia: studies with auditory moving window presentation.

David Caplan1, Gloria Waters

  • 1Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Vincent Burnham 827, Massachusetts General Hospital, Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. dcaplan@partners.org

Brain and Language
|February 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Aphasic patients show difficulties with sentence plausibility judgments, especially with complex syntax. However, many retain online syntactic processing abilities, with variations based on comprehension level and diagnosis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characteristics, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Aphasia in Patients With Brain Tumors: A Scoping Review.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Treatment-induced neural reorganization in aphasia is language-domain specific: Evidence from a large-scale fMRI study.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2023
Same author

Structural disconnections associated with language impairments in chronic post-stroke aphasia using disconnectome maps.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2022
Same author

The Role of Working Memory, Short-Term Memory, Speed of Processing, Education, and Locality in Verb-Related Morphosyntactic Production: Evidence From Greek.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same author

Buildout and integration of an automated high-throughput CLIA laboratory for SARS-CoV-2 testing on a large urban campus.

SLAS technology·2022
Same author

Perilesional Perfusion in Chronic Stroke-Induced Aphasia and Its Response to Behavioral Treatment Interventions.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2022
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neurolinguistics

Background:

  • Aphasia following left hemisphere stroke often impairs language comprehension.
  • Understanding the online processing of syntactic structures in aphasia is crucial for characterizing comprehension deficits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate online syntactic processing in aphasic patients using an auditory moving windows task.
  • To examine how syntactic complexity affects plausibility judgments in patients with aphasia compared to controls.
  • To explore the relationship between comprehension level, clinical diagnosis, and online syntactic processing in aphasia.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-eight aphasic patients and matched controls participated.
  • An auditory moving windows task was employed, presenting sentence phrases sequentially.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects made self-paced button presses and timed plausibility judgments for sentences varying in syntactic complexity.
  • Main Results:

    • Aphasic patients made more errors and judgments took longer than controls.
    • Syntactic complexity significantly impacted plausibility judgments more in patients than controls.
    • High-performing aphasic patients showed similar online syntactic effects to controls, unlike low-performing patients.
    • Broca's aphasic patients appeared to not process complex syntax online, while fluent aphasics' impairments occurred post-online processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Many aphasic patients can process syntactic structure online, despite comprehension deficits.
    • Different subgroups of aphasic patients exhibit distinct patterns of online syntactic processing based on their comprehension abilities and clinical diagnosis.
    • These findings aid in differentiating subtypes of syntactic comprehension disorders in aphasia.